Use of flavored and modified risk smokeless tobacco products among American Indian adults.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nasir Mushtaq, Kate Kouplen, Laura A Beebe
{"title":"Use of flavored and modified risk smokeless tobacco products among American Indian adults.","authors":"Nasir Mushtaq, Kate Kouplen, Laura A Beebe","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about the use of modified risk smokeless tobacco products (MRSTP) and flavored smokeless tobacco (ST) products among American Indians (AI). Aim of this study is to evaluate differences in tobacco use characteristics, ST dependence, and cotinine levels according to the use of flavored ST and MRSTP among AI ST users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study was based on cross-sectional data collected from a community-based sample of 120 adult male AI exclusive ST users. Sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco use behaviors, ST dependence, and characteristics of ST products were obtained through phone surveys. Saliva samples were collected to measure cotinine levels. MRSTP users were defined as those who used Copenhagen Classic snuff. Associations of flavored ST and MRSTP with tobacco use behaviors, cotinine, and ST dependence were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of study participants (58.3%) used non-flavored ST, whereas 12% reported MRSTP use. Flavored ST use was significantly more prevalent among young adults (62.5%). Flavored ST users had significantly lower number of dips per day, cotinine levels, and severity of dependence compared to non-flavored product users. MRSTP users were significantly older in age and had more years of ST use compared to nonMRSTP users. There were no differences in cotinine level, ST dependence, and past quit attempts based on MRSTP use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI ST users have high prevalence of non-flavored ST use. Findings of ST-related abuse liability among MRSTP users suggest a limited role of these products in facilitating complete tobacco cessation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study findings provide insights into the possible impact of FDA's smokeless tobacco-related regulations such as the designation of certain ST products as modified risk tobacco products and the sale of flavored ST products on ST use. The high prevalence of flavored ST among young AI ST users underscores the need for stringent regulations of flavored ST products. Findings of ST-related abuse liability among MRSTP users suggest a limited role of these products in facilitating complete tobacco cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the use of modified risk smokeless tobacco products (MRSTP) and flavored smokeless tobacco (ST) products among American Indians (AI). Aim of this study is to evaluate differences in tobacco use characteristics, ST dependence, and cotinine levels according to the use of flavored ST and MRSTP among AI ST users.

Methods: Study was based on cross-sectional data collected from a community-based sample of 120 adult male AI exclusive ST users. Sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco use behaviors, ST dependence, and characteristics of ST products were obtained through phone surveys. Saliva samples were collected to measure cotinine levels. MRSTP users were defined as those who used Copenhagen Classic snuff. Associations of flavored ST and MRSTP with tobacco use behaviors, cotinine, and ST dependence were evaluated.

Results: The majority of study participants (58.3%) used non-flavored ST, whereas 12% reported MRSTP use. Flavored ST use was significantly more prevalent among young adults (62.5%). Flavored ST users had significantly lower number of dips per day, cotinine levels, and severity of dependence compared to non-flavored product users. MRSTP users were significantly older in age and had more years of ST use compared to nonMRSTP users. There were no differences in cotinine level, ST dependence, and past quit attempts based on MRSTP use.

Conclusion: AI ST users have high prevalence of non-flavored ST use. Findings of ST-related abuse liability among MRSTP users suggest a limited role of these products in facilitating complete tobacco cessation.

Implications: The study findings provide insights into the possible impact of FDA's smokeless tobacco-related regulations such as the designation of certain ST products as modified risk tobacco products and the sale of flavored ST products on ST use. The high prevalence of flavored ST among young AI ST users underscores the need for stringent regulations of flavored ST products. Findings of ST-related abuse liability among MRSTP users suggest a limited role of these products in facilitating complete tobacco cessation.

美国印第安成年人使用调味和改良无烟烟草产品的风险。
引言:美国印第安人(AI)对改良风险无烟烟草制品(MRSTP)和调味无烟烟草制品(ST)的使用情况知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估烟叶使用者在烟叶使用特征、烟叶依赖和可替宁水平上的差异。方法:研究基于从社区收集的120名成年男性AI独家ST用户样本的横断面数据。通过电话调查获得社会人口学特征、烟草使用行为、ST依赖、ST产品特征。唾液样本被收集来测量可替宁的水平。MRSTP使用者被定义为那些使用哥本哈根经典鼻烟的人。我们评估了加味ST和MRSTP与烟草使用行为、可替宁和ST依赖的关系。结果:大多数研究参与者(58.3%)使用无风味ST,而12%的人使用MRSTP。调味ST的使用在年轻人中更为普遍(62.5%)。与非调味产品用户相比,调味ST用户每天的滴注次数、可替宁水平和依赖程度显著降低。与非MRSTP用户相比,MRSTP用户明显年龄较大,使用ST的时间更长。基于MRSTP使用的可替宁水平、ST依赖性和过去的戒烟尝试没有差异。结论:AI ST用户使用无风味ST的比例较高。MRSTP使用者中st相关滥用责任的调查结果表明,这些产品在促进完全戒烟方面的作用有限。启示:该研究结果为FDA无烟烟草相关法规的可能影响提供了见解,例如将某些ST产品指定为改性风险烟草产品以及销售调味ST产品对ST使用的影响。调味ST在年轻AI ST用户中的高流行率强调了对调味ST产品进行严格监管的必要性。MRSTP使用者中st相关滥用责任的调查结果表明,这些产品在促进完全戒烟方面的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信