Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Henry H Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy.","authors":"Henry H Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06099-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with defecation. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy has been shown to effectively improve obstructed defecation symptoms caused by rectal partial prolapse and lack of support during first year postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and anatomical outcomes of this novel and minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This longitudinal prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, university-affiliated pelvic health clinic. Women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for treatment of ODS and for whom time since their surgery was at least 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients were contacted via telephone and were offered to come for an in-person evaluation, including symptom assessment (ODS symptoms, PFDI-20 and PGI-I questionnaires), POP-Q evaluation, and 3D dynamic ultrasound for assessment of rectal hypermobility. Clinical success was defined as not having any ODS symptoms (straining, incomplete emptying, or need to splint) in over 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical success was defined as not having rectal prolapse and compression ratio on ultrasound assessment of less than 50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients were eligible for inclusion, out of which 65 patients, averaging 63.3 ± 13.3 years in age and 27.1 ± 5.6 in body mass index (BMI), were recruited. Median follow-up time was 29 months. Subjective failure was noted in 18 patients (28.1%) who experienced symptoms in more than 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical failure, defined as having a compression ratio of more than 50% or rectal prolapse, was noted in seven patients (12.7%). Three patients failed treatment with a recurrence of rectal prolapse and two patients underwent ventral mesh rectopexy within 1 year after surgery. Ultrasound measurements revealed that compression ratio significantly reduced from 52.9% ± 24.7 to 17.7% ± 12.3 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial anatomical improvements during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study indicates that transvaginal sacrospinous ligament rectopexy is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive effective alternative for treating ODS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06099-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with defecation. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy has been shown to effectively improve obstructed defecation symptoms caused by rectal partial prolapse and lack of support during first year postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and anatomical outcomes of this novel and minimally invasive surgery.

Materials and methods: This longitudinal prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, university-affiliated pelvic health clinic. Women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for treatment of ODS and for whom time since their surgery was at least 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients were contacted via telephone and were offered to come for an in-person evaluation, including symptom assessment (ODS symptoms, PFDI-20 and PGI-I questionnaires), POP-Q evaluation, and 3D dynamic ultrasound for assessment of rectal hypermobility. Clinical success was defined as not having any ODS symptoms (straining, incomplete emptying, or need to splint) in over 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical success was defined as not having rectal prolapse and compression ratio on ultrasound assessment of less than 50%.

Results: A total of 135 patients were eligible for inclusion, out of which 65 patients, averaging 63.3 ± 13.3 years in age and 27.1 ± 5.6 in body mass index (BMI), were recruited. Median follow-up time was 29 months. Subjective failure was noted in 18 patients (28.1%) who experienced symptoms in more than 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical failure, defined as having a compression ratio of more than 50% or rectal prolapse, was noted in seven patients (12.7%). Three patients failed treatment with a recurrence of rectal prolapse and two patients underwent ventral mesh rectopexy within 1 year after surgery. Ultrasound measurements revealed that compression ratio significantly reduced from 52.9% ± 24.7 to 17.7% ± 12.3 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial anatomical improvements during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study indicates that transvaginal sacrospinous ligament rectopexy is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive effective alternative for treating ODS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信