Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Henry H Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy.","authors":"Henry H Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06099-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with defecation. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy has been shown to effectively improve obstructed defecation symptoms caused by rectal partial prolapse and lack of support during first year postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and anatomical outcomes of this novel and minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This longitudinal prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, university-affiliated pelvic health clinic. Women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for treatment of ODS and for whom time since their surgery was at least 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients were contacted via telephone and were offered to come for an in-person evaluation, including symptom assessment (ODS symptoms, PFDI-20 and PGI-I questionnaires), POP-Q evaluation, and 3D dynamic ultrasound for assessment of rectal hypermobility. Clinical success was defined as not having any ODS symptoms (straining, incomplete emptying, or need to splint) in over 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical success was defined as not having rectal prolapse and compression ratio on ultrasound assessment of less than 50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients were eligible for inclusion, out of which 65 patients, averaging 63.3 ± 13.3 years in age and 27.1 ± 5.6 in body mass index (BMI), were recruited. Median follow-up time was 29 months. Subjective failure was noted in 18 patients (28.1%) who experienced symptoms in more than 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical failure, defined as having a compression ratio of more than 50% or rectal prolapse, was noted in seven patients (12.7%). Three patients failed treatment with a recurrence of rectal prolapse and two patients underwent ventral mesh rectopexy within 1 year after surgery. Ultrasound measurements revealed that compression ratio significantly reduced from 52.9% ± 24.7 to 17.7% ± 12.3 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial anatomical improvements during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, this study indicates that transvaginal sacrospinous ligament rectopexy is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive effective alternative for treating ODS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06099-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is characterized by a combination of straining, incomplete evacuation, and the use of digital manipulation with defecation. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament suture rectopexy has been shown to effectively improve obstructed defecation symptoms caused by rectal partial prolapse and lack of support during first year postoperatively. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and anatomical outcomes of this novel and minimally invasive surgery.

Materials and methods: This longitudinal prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, university-affiliated pelvic health clinic. Women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for treatment of ODS and for whom time since their surgery was at least 12 months were eligible for inclusion. Patients were contacted via telephone and were offered to come for an in-person evaluation, including symptom assessment (ODS symptoms, PFDI-20 and PGI-I questionnaires), POP-Q evaluation, and 3D dynamic ultrasound for assessment of rectal hypermobility. Clinical success was defined as not having any ODS symptoms (straining, incomplete emptying, or need to splint) in over 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical success was defined as not having rectal prolapse and compression ratio on ultrasound assessment of less than 50%.

Results: A total of 135 patients were eligible for inclusion, out of which 65 patients, averaging 63.3 ± 13.3 years in age and 27.1 ± 5.6 in body mass index (BMI), were recruited. Median follow-up time was 29 months. Subjective failure was noted in 18 patients (28.1%) who experienced symptoms in more than 50% of bowel movements. Anatomical failure, defined as having a compression ratio of more than 50% or rectal prolapse, was noted in seven patients (12.7%). Three patients failed treatment with a recurrence of rectal prolapse and two patients underwent ventral mesh rectopexy within 1 year after surgery. Ultrasound measurements revealed that compression ratio significantly reduced from 52.9% ± 24.7 to 17.7% ± 12.3 (p < 0.001), indicating substantial anatomical improvements during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study indicates that transvaginal sacrospinous ligament rectopexy is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive effective alternative for treating ODS.

经阴道骶棘韧带缝合直肠固定术的远期疗效。
介绍和假设:排便障碍综合征(ODS)的特征是紧张,不完全排便和使用指法排便的结合。经阴道骶棘韧带缝合直肠固定术可有效改善术后一年内因直肠部分脱垂和缺乏支撑引起的排便障碍症状。本研究旨在探讨这种新型微创手术的长期临床和解剖学结果。材料和方法:这项纵向前瞻性队列研究是在一所大学附属的三级骨盆健康诊所进行的。接受经阴道骶棘直肠切除术治疗ODS且手术时间至少为12个月的妇女符合纳入条件。通过电话联系患者,并邀请患者前来进行当面评估,包括症状评估(ODS症状、PFDI-20和PGI-I问卷)、POP-Q评估和用于评估直肠过度活动的3D动态超声。临床成功的定义是在超过50%的排便中没有任何ODS症状(紧张、排空不完全或需要夹板)。解剖成功定义为无直肠脱垂,超声评估压缩比小于50%。结果:共纳入135例患者,共纳入65例患者,平均年龄63.3±13.3岁,体重指数(BMI) 27.1±5.6。中位随访时间为29个月。18名患者(28.1%)出现主观功能衰竭,其排便症状超过50%。解剖失败,定义为压迫比超过50%或直肠脱垂,在7例(12.7%)中被注意到。3例患者因直肠脱垂复发治疗失败,2例患者术后1年内行腹侧补片直肠固定术。超声测量显示压缩比从52.9%±24.7显著降低到17.7%±12.3 (p < 0.001),表明随访期间解剖结构有了实质性改善。结论:经阴道骶棘韧带直肠固定术是一种安全、可行、微创、有效的治疗ODS的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信