Provider Treatment and Sexual Health Outcomes for Black Women: Historical Context and Post-pandemic Access to Reproductive Resources.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marquitta Dorsey, Jordan Freeman, Alejandra Priede, Dione King, Tyriesa Howard, Amunn Jaffery
{"title":"Provider Treatment and Sexual Health Outcomes for Black Women: Historical Context and Post-pandemic Access to Reproductive Resources.","authors":"Marquitta Dorsey, Jordan Freeman, Alejandra Priede, Dione King, Tyriesa Howard, Amunn Jaffery","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02323-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 quarantine, the insufficient prioritization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) resources exacerbated health disparities experienced by young Black women in the post-pandemic period. The historical legacy of medical treatment of Black women persists within current systems of care. In this study, we use the biopsychosocial framework to investigate perceived healthcare treatment and barriers to accessing SRH resources for Black women. We aim to understand how perceived provider treatment impacts SRH experiences and which experiences were perceived as a barrier to accessing SRH resources. Using a cross-sectional design, Qualtrics Panel participants, between ages 18 and 29 years, who identify as Black/African American and female, and living in the USA responded to a sexual health questionnaire. Results from T-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression models indicate that perceptions of poor provider treatment are associated with poorer SRH experiences, with decreased odds of receiving a prescription for a birth control method (CI 0.913-0.978); receiving a check-up or medical test related to using birth control (CI 0.93-0.997); receiving counseling or information about birth control (CI 0.917-0.983); and asking a question about whether the participant wants to become pregnant in the next year (CI 0.900-0.97). Sexual health advocates should focus on marginalized groups accessing SRH resources. These groups experienced exacerbated sexual health disparities due to treatment delays during COVID-related quarantine orders. Social work and public health researchers should investigate how state and federal policies can prioritize equitable treatment for those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a post-pandemic era.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02323-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 quarantine, the insufficient prioritization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) resources exacerbated health disparities experienced by young Black women in the post-pandemic period. The historical legacy of medical treatment of Black women persists within current systems of care. In this study, we use the biopsychosocial framework to investigate perceived healthcare treatment and barriers to accessing SRH resources for Black women. We aim to understand how perceived provider treatment impacts SRH experiences and which experiences were perceived as a barrier to accessing SRH resources. Using a cross-sectional design, Qualtrics Panel participants, between ages 18 and 29 years, who identify as Black/African American and female, and living in the USA responded to a sexual health questionnaire. Results from T-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression models indicate that perceptions of poor provider treatment are associated with poorer SRH experiences, with decreased odds of receiving a prescription for a birth control method (CI 0.913-0.978); receiving a check-up or medical test related to using birth control (CI 0.93-0.997); receiving counseling or information about birth control (CI 0.917-0.983); and asking a question about whether the participant wants to become pregnant in the next year (CI 0.900-0.97). Sexual health advocates should focus on marginalized groups accessing SRH resources. These groups experienced exacerbated sexual health disparities due to treatment delays during COVID-related quarantine orders. Social work and public health researchers should investigate how state and federal policies can prioritize equitable treatment for those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a post-pandemic era.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信