The effects of tactile stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on upper limb function and daily activities in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Marko Vidovič, Gaj Vidmar, Tibor Kafel, Lea Šuc, Nataša Bizovičar
{"title":"The effects of tactile stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on upper limb function and daily activities in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Marko Vidovič, Gaj Vidmar, Tibor Kafel, Lea Šuc, Nataša Bizovičar","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the separate effects of tactile stimulation (TS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), combined with occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT), on sensory-motor recovery in the upper limb of patients with stroke. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to three groups (mean age: TS group = 60.7, TENS group = 54.1, control group = 52.2 years). The average onset time was 9.7 months for the TS group, 11.1 months for the TENS group, and 10.2 months for the control group. Participants underwent a 2-week intervention provided in addition to standard OT and PT. The TS group received coarse sand stimulation (rubbing) over the affected hand and forearm for 15 min per session. The TENS group underwent electrical stimulation applied to the affected forearm for 30 min per session (10 Hz), while the control group received sham stimulation with 1 min of active current. Hand function was assessed with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and grip strength, dexterity with the box and block test and Southampton hand assessment procedure, and performance in daily activities with the assessment of motor and process skills. In the TS group, patients significantly improved hand sensory perception, grip strength, and dexterity while the TENS group showed improvement in grip strength and dexterity. The control group exhibited no significant changes. Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences favoring TS for hand sensory perception and TENS for dexterity. These findings suggest that adding TS or TENS to OT and PT may enhance sensory-motor recovery after a stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the separate effects of tactile stimulation (TS) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), combined with occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT), on sensory-motor recovery in the upper limb of patients with stroke. Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to three groups (mean age: TS group = 60.7, TENS group = 54.1, control group = 52.2 years). The average onset time was 9.7 months for the TS group, 11.1 months for the TENS group, and 10.2 months for the control group. Participants underwent a 2-week intervention provided in addition to standard OT and PT. The TS group received coarse sand stimulation (rubbing) over the affected hand and forearm for 15 min per session. The TENS group underwent electrical stimulation applied to the affected forearm for 30 min per session (10 Hz), while the control group received sham stimulation with 1 min of active current. Hand function was assessed with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and grip strength, dexterity with the box and block test and Southampton hand assessment procedure, and performance in daily activities with the assessment of motor and process skills. In the TS group, patients significantly improved hand sensory perception, grip strength, and dexterity while the TENS group showed improvement in grip strength and dexterity. The control group exhibited no significant changes. Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences favoring TS for hand sensory perception and TENS for dexterity. These findings suggest that adding TS or TENS to OT and PT may enhance sensory-motor recovery after a stroke.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信