Emerging treatments for dermatologic diseases in infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials on biologics and small molecule inhibitors.
Alireza Jafarzadeh, Elham Behrangi, Mina Khosravi, Saba Falakeh, Jasmine Khalilnejad Amiri, Azadeh Goodarzi
{"title":"Emerging treatments for dermatologic diseases in infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials on biologics and small molecule inhibitors.","authors":"Alireza Jafarzadeh, Elham Behrangi, Mina Khosravi, Saba Falakeh, Jasmine Khalilnejad Amiri, Azadeh Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s10787-025-01675-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in the treatment of paediatric dermatological conditions have emerged with the introduction of biologics and small molecule inhibitors (SMIs). These therapies target specific inflammatory pathways, which may enhance treatment outcomes for diseases like atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and alopecia areata.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review seeks to assess the effectiveness and safety of biologics and SMIs for dermatologic conditions in children and adolescents, with an emphasis on randomised clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an extensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies included in the review were those that analysed systemic treatments using biologics and SMIs in subjects under 18 years of age. We extracted data on participant demographics, treatment regimens, effectiveness outcomes, adverse effects, and follow-up details. The risk of bias in the studies was determined using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 1,454 studies, 49 articles fitting the inclusion criteria were identified, encompassing 6372 cases. The review found that biologics such as Dupilumab, along with investigational JAK inhibitors like Abrocitinib and Upadacitinib, exhibited considerable efficacy in treating various conditions, particularly atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Dupilumab specifically demonstrated significant improvements in both disease severity and quality of life. While most reported adverse events were mild to moderate, some serious adverse events were noted with certain treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologics and SMIs show great promise as therapeutic options in paediatric dermatology, offering better efficacy compared to traditional treatments. Despite these encouraging findings, additional research is needed to verify their long-term safety, especially in relation to growth and development in younger patients. Future investigations should aim to include a broader range of patient demographics and dermatological conditions beyond those currently studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":13551,"journal":{"name":"Inflammopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1617-1672"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-025-01675-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent advancements in the treatment of paediatric dermatological conditions have emerged with the introduction of biologics and small molecule inhibitors (SMIs). These therapies target specific inflammatory pathways, which may enhance treatment outcomes for diseases like atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and alopecia areata.
Objectives: This systematic review seeks to assess the effectiveness and safety of biologics and SMIs for dermatologic conditions in children and adolescents, with an emphasis on randomised clinical trials.
Methods: We performed an extensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies included in the review were those that analysed systemic treatments using biologics and SMIs in subjects under 18 years of age. We extracted data on participant demographics, treatment regimens, effectiveness outcomes, adverse effects, and follow-up details. The risk of bias in the studies was determined using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).
Results: From an initial pool of 1,454 studies, 49 articles fitting the inclusion criteria were identified, encompassing 6372 cases. The review found that biologics such as Dupilumab, along with investigational JAK inhibitors like Abrocitinib and Upadacitinib, exhibited considerable efficacy in treating various conditions, particularly atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Dupilumab specifically demonstrated significant improvements in both disease severity and quality of life. While most reported adverse events were mild to moderate, some serious adverse events were noted with certain treatments.
Conclusions: Biologics and SMIs show great promise as therapeutic options in paediatric dermatology, offering better efficacy compared to traditional treatments. Despite these encouraging findings, additional research is needed to verify their long-term safety, especially in relation to growth and development in younger patients. Future investigations should aim to include a broader range of patient demographics and dermatological conditions beyond those currently studied.
背景:随着生物制剂和小分子抑制剂(SMIs)的引入,儿科皮肤病的治疗取得了最新进展。这些疗法针对特定的炎症途径,这可能会提高特应性皮炎、牛皮癣和斑秃等疾病的治疗效果。目的:本系统综述旨在评估生物制剂和SMIs治疗儿童和青少年皮肤病的有效性和安全性,重点是随机临床试验。方法:我们在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science上进行了广泛的文献检索,遵循PRISMA指南。纳入该综述的研究分析了在18岁以下受试者中使用生物制剂和SMIs的系统治疗。我们提取了参与者人口统计学、治疗方案、疗效结局、不良反应和随访细节的数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB2)确定研究的偏倚风险。结果:从最初的1454项研究中,确定了49篇符合纳入标准的文章,包括6372例病例。该综述发现,生物制剂如Dupilumab,以及研究性JAK抑制剂如Abrocitinib和Upadacitinib,在治疗各种疾病,特别是特应性皮炎和牛皮癣方面表现出相当大的疗效。Dupilumab在疾病严重程度和生活质量方面均有显著改善。虽然大多数报告的不良事件是轻度到中度的,但某些治疗也注意到一些严重的不良事件。结论:与传统治疗方法相比,生物制剂和SMIs作为儿科皮肤病的治疗选择具有更好的疗效。尽管有这些令人鼓舞的发现,但还需要进一步的研究来验证它们的长期安全性,特别是与年轻患者的生长发育有关。未来的调查应旨在包括更广泛的患者人口统计数据和皮肤状况,超出目前的研究。
期刊介绍:
Inflammopharmacology is the official publication of the Gastrointestinal Section of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) and the Hungarian Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Society (HECPS). Inflammopharmacology publishes papers on all aspects of inflammation and its pharmacological control emphasizing comparisons of (a) different inflammatory states, and (b) the actions, therapeutic efficacy and safety of drugs employed in the treatment of inflammatory conditions. The comparative aspects of the types of inflammatory conditions include gastrointestinal disease (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn''s disease), parasitic diseases, toxicological manifestations of the effects of drugs and environmental agents, arthritic conditions, and inflammatory effects of injury or aging on skeletal muscle. The journal has seven main interest areas:
-Drug-Disease Interactions - Conditional Pharmacology - i.e. where the condition (disease or stress state) influences the therapeutic response and side (adverse) effects from anti-inflammatory drugs. Mechanisms of drug-disease and drug disease interactions and the role of different stress states
-Rheumatology - particular emphasis on methods of measurement of clinical response effects of new agents, adverse effects from anti-rheumatic drugs
-Gastroenterology - with particular emphasis on animal and human models, mechanisms of mucosal inflammation and ulceration and effects of novel and established anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory agents, or antiparasitic agents
-Neuro-Inflammation and Pain - model systems, pharmacology of new analgesic agents and mechanisms of neuro-inflammation and pain
-Novel drugs, natural products and nutraceuticals - and their effects on inflammatory processes, especially where there are indications of novel modes action compared with conventional drugs e.g. NSAIDs
-Muscle-immune interactions during inflammation [...]