Inhaled Corticosteroid-Long-Acting Beta-2 Agonist Fixed-Dose Combinations: Preferred Controller in 6- to 11-Year-Olds with Persistent Asthma.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Gizem Koken, Sinem Polat Terece, Ceren Varer Akpinar, Hacer Ilbilge Ertoy Karagol, Arzu Bakirtas
{"title":"Inhaled Corticosteroid-Long-Acting Beta-2 Agonist Fixed-Dose Combinations: Preferred Controller in 6- to 11-Year-Olds with Persistent Asthma.","authors":"Gizem Koken, Sinem Polat Terece, Ceren Varer Akpinar, Hacer Ilbilge Ertoy Karagol, Arzu Bakirtas","doi":"10.1159/000544938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>So far, there is no direct comparison between inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy and ICS-long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) fixed-dose combination therapies in 6- to 11-year-old children with persistent asthma. The primary objective of this study was to compare ICS monotherapy and ICS-LABA fixed-dose combination therapies for the frequency of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids (CS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 6-11 years diagnosed with persistent asthma during steps 2-4 of treatment, prescribed daily ICS-containing treatment (fluticasone propionate [FP], fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FP/SAL], and budesonide/formoterol [BUD/F]), and followed for at least 1 year at our institution from January 2021 to January 2024 were included. The hospital's electronic database was used to retrospectively record asthma controller medication, frequency of asthma exacerbations (including those requiring systemic CS, emergency department [ED] visit and/or hospitalization) and pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The frequency of all exacerbations, exacerbations requiring systemic CS, and exacerbations requiring ED visit/hospitalization were significantly higher in the FP group compared to the FP/SAL and BUD/F groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the FP/SAL and BUD/F groups concerning all exacerbation parameters (p > 0.05). The incidence of pneumonia was very low in the fixed-dose combination groups, making a statistical comparison unfeasible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICS-LABA fixed-dose combination therapies have been found to be more effective than ICS monotherapy in preventing asthma exacerbations in 6-11-year-old children with persistent asthma and could be recommended as the preferred controllers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: So far, there is no direct comparison between inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy and ICS-long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) fixed-dose combination therapies in 6- to 11-year-old children with persistent asthma. The primary objective of this study was to compare ICS monotherapy and ICS-LABA fixed-dose combination therapies for the frequency of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids (CS).

Methods: Patients aged 6-11 years diagnosed with persistent asthma during steps 2-4 of treatment, prescribed daily ICS-containing treatment (fluticasone propionate [FP], fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FP/SAL], and budesonide/formoterol [BUD/F]), and followed for at least 1 year at our institution from January 2021 to January 2024 were included. The hospital's electronic database was used to retrospectively record asthma controller medication, frequency of asthma exacerbations (including those requiring systemic CS, emergency department [ED] visit and/or hospitalization) and pneumonia.

Results: The frequency of all exacerbations, exacerbations requiring systemic CS, and exacerbations requiring ED visit/hospitalization were significantly higher in the FP group compared to the FP/SAL and BUD/F groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the FP/SAL and BUD/F groups concerning all exacerbation parameters (p > 0.05). The incidence of pneumonia was very low in the fixed-dose combination groups, making a statistical comparison unfeasible.

Conclusion: ICS-LABA fixed-dose combination therapies have been found to be more effective than ICS monotherapy in preventing asthma exacerbations in 6-11-year-old children with persistent asthma and could be recommended as the preferred controllers.

ICS-LABA固定剂量组合:6-11岁儿童持续性哮喘的首选控制器。
到目前为止,在6-11岁持续性哮喘儿童中,吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)单药治疗和ICS-长效β -2激动剂(LABA)固定剂量联合治疗没有直接比较。本研究的主要目的是比较ICS单药治疗和ICS- laba固定剂量联合治疗需要全身皮质类固醇(CS)的恶化频率。方法:纳入在治疗步骤2-4时诊断为持续性哮喘的6-11岁患者,每日处方含ics治疗(丙酸氟替卡松(FP),丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FP/SAL)和布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/F)),并于2021年1月至2024年1月在我机构随访至少1年。医院的电子数据库用于回顾性记录哮喘控制药物、哮喘发作频率(包括需要全身CS、急诊科(ED)就诊和/或住院的频率)和肺炎。结果:与FP/SAL组和BUD/F组相比,FP组的所有急性发作频率、需要全身CS的急性发作频率和需要ED就诊/住院的急性发作频率显著高于FP/SAL组(p0.05)。固定剂量联合用药组肺炎发生率极低,统计学比较不可行。结论:ICS- laba固定剂量联合治疗在预防6-11岁持续性哮喘患儿哮喘加重方面优于ICS单药治疗,可作为首选控制药物推荐使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信