Postmortem diagnostics in sudden unexpected death in infants and children: use and utility.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
A M Pries, A C van der Gugten, H A Moll, W M Klein, J Fuijkschot, P J Puiman
{"title":"Postmortem diagnostics in sudden unexpected death in infants and children: use and utility.","authors":"A M Pries, A C van der Gugten, H A Moll, W M Klein, J Fuijkschot, P J Puiman","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06035-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sudden unexpected death in infants (SUDI) and children (SUDC) requires thorough investigation to identify causes and prevention strategies. In the Netherlands, these deaths are investigated using the standardized postmortem evaluation of sudden unexpected death in infants and children (PESUDIC) procedure. This study examines the use of various diagnostic tests within PESUDIC and their effectiveness in determining causes of death. This observational study included infants and children who died suddenly and underwent the PESUDIC procedure from 2016 to 2022. Standardized data on medical history, postmortem examinations, and diagnostic outcomes were collected. Findings were classified by consensus of two experts as \"contributory\" if they supported the cause of death and \"decisive\" if they were leading for determination. A total of 275 cases were included. Median age was 13 months (IQR 3.5-73.3). Fifty-nine percent were boys. Over 95% of cases had a medical history, postmortem physical examination, biochemical, and microbiological testing available. Total body postmortem CT and/or MRI was done in 93% (n = 255) and autopsy in 62% (n = 171). The cause of death was determined in 193 (70%). History, imaging, and autopsy provided contributory results in 50% (n = 137/275), 40% (n = 103/255), and 67% (n = 115/171) of applicable cases, respectively. More than two different tests showed contributory findings in 52% of diagnosed cases. Autopsy and microbiological testing had decisive findings most often: in 83/171 and 44/265 cases respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A routinely performed wide array of postmortem investigations has additional value to an autopsy for identifying the cause of death in SUDI and SUDC. A thorough SUDY investigation should therefore minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing, and whole-body imaging.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• A thorough postmortem investigation into the cause of sudden death in infants and children can provide an explanation of the death and identify potential preventable causes.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• A thorough postmortem investigation for sudden unexpected death in infants and children should minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing and whole-body imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 3","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06035-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sudden unexpected death in infants (SUDI) and children (SUDC) requires thorough investigation to identify causes and prevention strategies. In the Netherlands, these deaths are investigated using the standardized postmortem evaluation of sudden unexpected death in infants and children (PESUDIC) procedure. This study examines the use of various diagnostic tests within PESUDIC and their effectiveness in determining causes of death. This observational study included infants and children who died suddenly and underwent the PESUDIC procedure from 2016 to 2022. Standardized data on medical history, postmortem examinations, and diagnostic outcomes were collected. Findings were classified by consensus of two experts as "contributory" if they supported the cause of death and "decisive" if they were leading for determination. A total of 275 cases were included. Median age was 13 months (IQR 3.5-73.3). Fifty-nine percent were boys. Over 95% of cases had a medical history, postmortem physical examination, biochemical, and microbiological testing available. Total body postmortem CT and/or MRI was done in 93% (n = 255) and autopsy in 62% (n = 171). The cause of death was determined in 193 (70%). History, imaging, and autopsy provided contributory results in 50% (n = 137/275), 40% (n = 103/255), and 67% (n = 115/171) of applicable cases, respectively. More than two different tests showed contributory findings in 52% of diagnosed cases. Autopsy and microbiological testing had decisive findings most often: in 83/171 and 44/265 cases respectively.

Conclusion: A routinely performed wide array of postmortem investigations has additional value to an autopsy for identifying the cause of death in SUDI and SUDC. A thorough SUDY investigation should therefore minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing, and whole-body imaging.

What is known: • A thorough postmortem investigation into the cause of sudden death in infants and children can provide an explanation of the death and identify potential preventable causes.

What is new: • A thorough postmortem investigation for sudden unexpected death in infants and children should minimally include an autopsy, microbiological testing and whole-body imaging.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信