Jessica Stout, Kerstin Austin, Sara Bonnes, Jason DuBroff, Alicia Muratore
{"title":"Celiac Disease and Gluten Cross-Contact: How Much is too Much?","authors":"Jessica Stout, Kerstin Austin, Sara Bonnes, Jason DuBroff, Alicia Muratore","doi":"10.1007/s13668-025-00621-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aimed to examine the variability in the susceptibility of the small intestine to injury when exposed to gluten among patients with celiac disease, particularly in the context of gluten cross-contact. It sought to address whether clinicians could recommend individualized gluten exposure levels based on current research to improve patient outcomes and quality of life, given the difficulties of maintaining a strict gluten-free diet.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While some evidence suggests variability in small intestine susceptibility to injury, no current studies offer a reliable method for clinicians to stratify patients or recommend safe gluten levels. Research points to possible roles of the microbiome and immune responses in susceptibility to injury, though no definitive conclusions have been made. There is insufficient evidence to safely recommend varying gluten thresholds for celiac patients. While factors like the microbiome and cytokine responses may influence the small intestine's susceptibility to injury when exposed to gluten, the recommendation of a strict gluten-free diet remains the best approach until more conclusive research emerges. Future studies may help tailor dietary advice and improve quality of life for individuals with celiac disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10844,"journal":{"name":"Current Nutrition Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Nutrition Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-025-00621-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review aimed to examine the variability in the susceptibility of the small intestine to injury when exposed to gluten among patients with celiac disease, particularly in the context of gluten cross-contact. It sought to address whether clinicians could recommend individualized gluten exposure levels based on current research to improve patient outcomes and quality of life, given the difficulties of maintaining a strict gluten-free diet.
Recent findings: While some evidence suggests variability in small intestine susceptibility to injury, no current studies offer a reliable method for clinicians to stratify patients or recommend safe gluten levels. Research points to possible roles of the microbiome and immune responses in susceptibility to injury, though no definitive conclusions have been made. There is insufficient evidence to safely recommend varying gluten thresholds for celiac patients. While factors like the microbiome and cytokine responses may influence the small intestine's susceptibility to injury when exposed to gluten, the recommendation of a strict gluten-free diet remains the best approach until more conclusive research emerges. Future studies may help tailor dietary advice and improve quality of life for individuals with celiac disease.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to provide comprehensive review articles that emphasize significant developments in nutrition research emerging in recent publications. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to discuss the influence of nutrition on major health conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and obesity, as well as the impact of nutrition on genetics, metabolic function, and public health. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an Editorial Board of more than 25 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, suggests topics of special importance to their country/region, and ensures that topics and current and include emerging research.