Efficacy and safety analysis of atezolizumab continuation beyond progression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Wenhao Shi, Xiaohui Bao, Jin Xiong, Yanqiao Wu, Jianguo Sun, Zhi Xu, Dairong Li, Yang Wei, Jun Ge, Biyong Ren, Yu Jiang, Kaijin Wang, Yusheng Huang, Zhenzhou Yang, Yuan Peng
{"title":"Efficacy and safety analysis of atezolizumab continuation beyond progression in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Wenhao Shi, Xiaohui Bao, Jin Xiong, Yanqiao Wu, Jianguo Sun, Zhi Xu, Dairong Li, Yang Wei, Jun Ge, Biyong Ren, Yu Jiang, Kaijin Wang, Yusheng Huang, Zhenzhou Yang, Yuan Peng","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01606-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. However, many patients eventually develop resistance to immunotherapy. While continued ICI therapy beyond disease progression has shown survival benefits in various cancers, research specific to ES-SCLC remains limited. Our study aimed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab continuation therapy to optimize the ICI continuation strategies for ES-SCLC. In this multicenter study, all enrolled patients received continued atezolizumab in combination therapy as second-line (2L) treatment after progression of first-line (1L) chemo-immunotherapy. The efficacy was measured by median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated based on incidence of adverse events (AEs). Among the 28 eligible patients in this study, mPFS was 4.07 months [95% CI: 1.15 to 6.98], and mOS was 18.87 months [95% CI: 15.28 to 22.45]. In the safety analysis, respiratory-related AEs were the most common, including cough (35.7%), dyspnea (35.7%), pneumonitis (35.7%). Additionally, thyroiditis (17.9%) was the most generally reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In subgroup analysis, the LTR group (1L-PFS ≥ 6 months) showed longer mOS compared with the STR group (1L-PFS < 6 months) [19.98 vs. 8.68 months, p = 0.021]. Patients with greater DpR (≥ 29% than < 29%) had longer mOS: 21.84 vs. 14.63, p < 0.01]. Atezolizumab continuation therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety in ES-SCLC patients progressing after 1L chemo-immunotherapy, particularly in those with favorable 1L treatment responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01606-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. However, many patients eventually develop resistance to immunotherapy. While continued ICI therapy beyond disease progression has shown survival benefits in various cancers, research specific to ES-SCLC remains limited. Our study aimed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab continuation therapy to optimize the ICI continuation strategies for ES-SCLC. In this multicenter study, all enrolled patients received continued atezolizumab in combination therapy as second-line (2L) treatment after progression of first-line (1L) chemo-immunotherapy. The efficacy was measured by median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS). Safety was evaluated based on incidence of adverse events (AEs). Among the 28 eligible patients in this study, mPFS was 4.07 months [95% CI: 1.15 to 6.98], and mOS was 18.87 months [95% CI: 15.28 to 22.45]. In the safety analysis, respiratory-related AEs were the most common, including cough (35.7%), dyspnea (35.7%), pneumonitis (35.7%). Additionally, thyroiditis (17.9%) was the most generally reported immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In subgroup analysis, the LTR group (1L-PFS ≥ 6 months) showed longer mOS compared with the STR group (1L-PFS < 6 months) [19.98 vs. 8.68 months, p = 0.021]. Patients with greater DpR (≥ 29% than < 29%) had longer mOS: 21.84 vs. 14.63, p < 0.01]. Atezolizumab continuation therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety in ES-SCLC patients progressing after 1L chemo-immunotherapy, particularly in those with favorable 1L treatment responses.

atezolizumab持续治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性分析
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现彻底改变了广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的治疗前景。然而,许多患者最终会对免疫疗法产生耐药性。尽管在疾病进展之后继续使用ICI治疗已显示出各种癌症的生存益处,但针对ES-SCLC的研究仍然有限。我们的研究旨在进一步评估atezolizumab延续治疗的有效性和安全性,以优化ES-SCLC的ICI延续策略。在这项多中心研究中,所有入组的患者在一线(1L)化疗免疫治疗进展后,继续接受atezolizumab联合治疗作为二线(2L)治疗。疗效通过中位总生存期(mOS)和中位无进展生存期(mPFS)来衡量。安全性根据不良事件(ae)的发生率进行评估。在本研究的28例符合条件的患者中,mPFS为4.07个月[95% CI: 1.15 ~ 6.98], mOS为18.87个月[95% CI: 15.28 ~ 22.45]。在安全性分析中,呼吸相关ae最为常见,包括咳嗽(35.7%)、呼吸困难(35.7%)、肺炎(35.7%)。此外,甲状腺炎(17.9%)是最常见的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。在亚组分析中,LTR组(1L-PFS≥6个月)的mOS较STR组(1L-PFS)更长
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信