Patient research priorities in melanoma: a national qualitative interview study.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Khaylen Mistry, Omsin Srimudkul, Mitesh Patel, John Ragan, Dimitrios Karponis, Zoe C Venables, Nick J Levell
{"title":"Patient research priorities in melanoma: a national qualitative interview study.","authors":"Khaylen Mistry, Omsin Srimudkul, Mitesh Patel, John Ragan, Dimitrios Karponis, Zoe C Venables, Nick J Levell","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes for advanced melanoma have improved following the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This heralds a need for reconsideration of future research agendas. Patients can - and are keen to - help identify and prioritize research topics to ensure future research benefits patients. No previous peer-reviewed research has reported patient research priorities for melanoma.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prioritized research topics of patients with melanoma in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with melanoma in the past 10 years, were recruited across England by skin cancer charities. Preinterview questionnaires obtained demographic, tumour and treatment information. Semi-structured interviews were conducted where patients were asked what they thought were important topics to research in melanoma. Using a grounded theory approach, transcripts were analysed in an iterative process to identify themes for patient research priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients were individually interviewed from eight of nine English regions. Five key themes were identified: (1) 'Risk factors and prevention of melanoma' - patients voiced a desire for research into modifiable risk factors and public campaigns to prevent melanoma; (2) 'Diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis of melanoma' - patients felt diagnostic delays could be reduced through research to support nonspecialists and integrating technology such as teledermatology or artificial intelligence'; (3) 'Indications, outcomes, side-effects and interactions of treatments for melanoma' - novel treatments inspired patients to encourage future research into the indications, outcomes and side-effects of therapeutic options; (4) 'Optimizing follow-up for melanoma' - with increased survivorship, research to support the delivery of a personalized approach to follow-up was valued; and (5) 'Factors that influence survival from melanoma' - patients prioritized research to accurately predict recurrence and survival based on patient-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first peer-reviewed study to report patient research priorities in melanoma. Many of the themes identified align with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence research recommendations. Additionally, novel themes were identified that provide a rationale to develop a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for melanoma. If research addresses topics relevant to patients, decision-makers will be equipped to deliver services that meet patient needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1055-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outcomes for advanced melanoma have improved following the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This heralds a need for reconsideration of future research agendas. Patients can - and are keen to - help identify and prioritize research topics to ensure future research benefits patients. No previous peer-reviewed research has reported patient research priorities for melanoma.

Objectives: To determine the prioritized research topics of patients with melanoma in England.

Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with melanoma in the past 10 years, were recruited across England by skin cancer charities. Preinterview questionnaires obtained demographic, tumour and treatment information. Semi-structured interviews were conducted where patients were asked what they thought were important topics to research in melanoma. Using a grounded theory approach, transcripts were analysed in an iterative process to identify themes for patient research priorities.

Results: Twenty patients were individually interviewed from eight of nine English regions. Five key themes were identified: (1) 'Risk factors and prevention of melanoma' - patients voiced a desire for research into modifiable risk factors and public campaigns to prevent melanoma; (2) 'Diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis of melanoma' - patients felt diagnostic delays could be reduced through research to support nonspecialists and integrating technology such as teledermatology or artificial intelligence'; (3) 'Indications, outcomes, side-effects and interactions of treatments for melanoma' - novel treatments inspired patients to encourage future research into the indications, outcomes and side-effects of therapeutic options; (4) 'Optimizing follow-up for melanoma' - with increased survivorship, research to support the delivery of a personalized approach to follow-up was valued; and (5) 'Factors that influence survival from melanoma' - patients prioritized research to accurately predict recurrence and survival based on patient-specific factors.

Conclusions: This is the first peer-reviewed study to report patient research priorities in melanoma. Many of the themes identified align with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence research recommendations. Additionally, novel themes were identified that provide a rationale to develop a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for melanoma. If research addresses topics relevant to patients, decision-makers will be equipped to deliver services that meet patient needs.

黑色素瘤患者研究的重点:一项全国定性访谈研究。
背景:随着免疫治疗和靶向治疗的出现,晚期黑色素瘤的预后有所改善。这预示着需要重新考虑未来的研究议程。患者能够并且热衷于帮助确定和优先考虑研究主题,以确保未来的研究对患者有益。此前没有同行评议的研究报告黑色素瘤的患者研究优先级。目的:确定英国黑色素瘤患者的优先研究课题。方法:在过去十年内被诊断为黑色素瘤的患者≥18岁,由皮肤癌慈善机构在英国招募。访谈前的问卷调查获得了人口统计、肿瘤和治疗信息。在进行半结构化访谈时,患者被问及他们认为黑色素瘤研究的重要主题是什么。使用扎实的理论方法,在迭代过程中分析转录本,以确定患者研究优先事项的主题。结果:对来自8/9个英语地区的20例患者进行了单独访谈。确定了五个关键主题。(1)黑色素瘤的危险因素及预防。患者表示希望研究可改变的风险因素,并开展预防黑色素瘤的公共活动。(2)黑色素瘤的诊断延误和误诊。患者认为,通过研究来支持非专业人士,并整合远程皮肤科或人工智能等技术,可以减少诊断延误。(3)黑色素瘤治疗的适应症、转归、副作用和相互作用。新颖的治疗方法激励患者鼓励对适应症,结果和治疗方案的副作用的未来研究。(4)优化黑色素瘤随访。随着生存率的提高,支持个性化随访方法的研究受到重视。(5)影响黑色素瘤生存的因素。患者优先考虑基于患者特异性因素准确预测复发和生存的研究。结论:这是第一个报告黑色素瘤患者研究重点的同行评议研究。确定的许多主题与NICE的研究建议一致。此外,新的主题被确定,这为詹姆斯·林德联盟黑色素瘤优先设定伙伴关系的发展提供了理论依据。如果研究涉及与患者相关的主题,决策者将有能力提供满足患者需求的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信