Absolute Eosinophil Counts as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of African Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_203_24
S Shravani, Ashwin Kulkarni, Shaikh Mohammed Aslam, K Mohammed Suhail, Rafi Mohammed Shaji
{"title":"Absolute Eosinophil Counts as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis.","authors":"S Shravani, Ashwin Kulkarni, Shaikh Mohammed Aslam, K Mohammed Suhail, Rafi Mohammed Shaji","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_203_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. It is necessary to have markers of severity that are easily accessible and useful to guide treatment in a timely manner. Eosinophil count could be a potential biomarker in sepsis, and it is routinely checked in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To assess absolute eosinophil count (AEC) as prognostic marker in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India. A total of 100 patients admitted with sepsis were included. AEC and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were calculated at admission and after 72 h. AEC was correlated with the SOFA score. These patients were clinically followed up during their hospital stay. A receiver operating characteristic curve was developed to determine the optimum AEC cutoff point for predicting mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Decreasing trend of AEC during the course of hospital stay (after 72 h) of admission was found to have a strong negative correlation with SOFA score. AEC cutoff <50 cells/mm 3 after 72 h of admission was associated with increased mortality. Low AEC after 72 h of admission and decreasing trend of AEC were associated with increased risk of requirement of ionotropic support, dialysis, ventilator, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A decline in AEC after 72 h of admission was linked to increased mortality. Therefore, eosinophil count can be used as a cost-effective marker for assessing severity and prognosis in patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"332-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_203_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. It is necessary to have markers of severity that are easily accessible and useful to guide treatment in a timely manner. Eosinophil count could be a potential biomarker in sepsis, and it is routinely checked in clinical practice.

Aims and objectives: To assess absolute eosinophil count (AEC) as prognostic marker in patients with sepsis.

Methodology: This observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in South India. A total of 100 patients admitted with sepsis were included. AEC and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were calculated at admission and after 72 h. AEC was correlated with the SOFA score. These patients were clinically followed up during their hospital stay. A receiver operating characteristic curve was developed to determine the optimum AEC cutoff point for predicting mortality.

Results: Decreasing trend of AEC during the course of hospital stay (after 72 h) of admission was found to have a strong negative correlation with SOFA score. AEC cutoff <50 cells/mm 3 after 72 h of admission was associated with increased mortality. Low AEC after 72 h of admission and decreasing trend of AEC were associated with increased risk of requirement of ionotropic support, dialysis, ventilator, and mortality.

Conclusion: A decline in AEC after 72 h of admission was linked to increased mortality. Therefore, eosinophil count can be used as a cost-effective marker for assessing severity and prognosis in patients with sepsis.

绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数作为脓毒症患者的预后指标。
背景:脓毒症是危重症患者死亡和发病的主要原因。有必要有严重程度的标志,容易获得和有用的指导治疗及时的方式。嗜酸性粒细胞计数可能是脓毒症的潜在生物标志物,在临床实践中经常检查。目的和目的:评估绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数(AEC)作为脓毒症患者预后指标的价值。方法:本观察性研究在印度南部的一家三级医院进行。共纳入100例败血症住院患者。入院时和72 h后分别计算AEC和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,AEC与SOFA评分相关。这些患者在住院期间接受临床随访。建立了受试者工作特征曲线,以确定预测死亡率的最佳AEC截止点。结果:住院期间(入院72 h后)AEC下降趋势与SOFA评分呈较强的负相关。结论:入院72小时后AEC下降与死亡率增加有关。因此,嗜酸性粒细胞计数可作为评估脓毒症患者严重程度和预后的一种具有成本效益的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信