Assessment of Postoperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy Following Instillation of Bupivacaine through Surgical Drains.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of African Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.4103/aam.aam_151_24
R Sneha, R K Ranjan, Mahesh Nayak, Shilpa A Naik, Ashna Shetty, B Prathvi
{"title":"Assessment of Postoperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy Following Instillation of Bupivacaine through Surgical Drains.","authors":"R Sneha, R K Ranjan, Mahesh Nayak, Shilpa A Naik, Ashna Shetty, B Prathvi","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_151_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, breast cancer is a significant public health concern in women. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly used surgical treatment. Postmastectomy pain is a serious concern because, if left untreated, can have psychological effects, resulting in postoperative complications. This observational study aimed to assess the effectiveness of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia administered using surgical drains after MRM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty female patients who underwent MRM were included in the study. Patients in Group A received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 20 mL through each drain placed in the axilla and chest wall below flap. Patients in Group B received standard postoperative pain management. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was evaluated every 4 h for 24 h. When the patient's VAS score was higher than 3 at any point during the treatment, they received slow intravenous injections of 1 mg/kg tramadol. The period of analgesia was measured from the point when the analgesic was introduced until the onset of the first rescue analgesia. Both the total number of times the medication was administered, and the total number of analgesics needed were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median total dose of rescue analgesia given to Group B (median = 113.0 mg tramadol) was higher compared to Group A (median = 47.5 mg tramadol) with P = 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received bupivacaine through surgical drains experienced longer and more effective analgesia. It is an easy, economical way to get good analgesia following surgery with minimal adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"292-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_151_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, breast cancer is a significant public health concern in women. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly used surgical treatment. Postmastectomy pain is a serious concern because, if left untreated, can have psychological effects, resulting in postoperative complications. This observational study aimed to assess the effectiveness of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia administered using surgical drains after MRM.

Methods: Sixty female patients who underwent MRM were included in the study. Patients in Group A received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 20 mL through each drain placed in the axilla and chest wall below flap. Patients in Group B received standard postoperative pain management. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was evaluated every 4 h for 24 h. When the patient's VAS score was higher than 3 at any point during the treatment, they received slow intravenous injections of 1 mg/kg tramadol. The period of analgesia was measured from the point when the analgesic was introduced until the onset of the first rescue analgesia. Both the total number of times the medication was administered, and the total number of analgesics needed were recorded.

Results: The median total dose of rescue analgesia given to Group B (median = 113.0 mg tramadol) was higher compared to Group A (median = 47.5 mg tramadol) with P = 0.001.

Conclusion: Patients who received bupivacaine through surgical drains experienced longer and more effective analgesia. It is an easy, economical way to get good analgesia following surgery with minimal adverse reactions.

改良乳房根治术经引流管灌注布比卡因术后镇痛效果评价。
背景:在全球范围内,乳腺癌是妇女的一个重大公共卫生问题。改良乳房根治术(MRM)是一种常用的手术治疗方法。乳房切除术后疼痛是一个严重的问题,因为如果不及时治疗,可能会对心理产生影响,导致术后并发症。本观察性研究旨在评估布比卡因用于MRM术后引流管镇痛的有效性。方法:选取60例行磁共振成像的女性患者作为研究对象。A组患者给予0.25%布比卡因40 mL,各20 mL,通过皮瓣下腋窝和胸壁的引流管。B组患者接受标准的术后疼痛处理。术后每4 h评估一次视觉模拟评分(VAS),持续24 h。当患者在治疗过程中的任何时刻VAS评分高于3分时,给予曲马多1 mg/kg缓慢静脉注射。镇痛时间从引入镇痛药到第一次抢救镇痛开始测量。记录给药总次数和所需镇痛药总剂量。结果:B组抢救镇痛总剂量中位数(曲马多113.0 mg)高于A组(曲马多47.5 mg), P = 0.001。结论:经外科引流管给予布比卡因的患者镇痛时间更长,效果更好。这是一种简单、经济、不良反应最小的手术后镇痛方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信