Determining safe washout period for immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to liver transplantation: An international retrospective cohort study.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000001289
Beat Moeckli, Charles-Henri Wassmer, Sofia El Hajji, Rohan Kumar, Joana Rodrigues Ribeiro, Parissa Tabrizian, Hao Feng, Gabriel Schnickel, Anand V Kulkarni, Manon Allaire, Sonal Asthana, Constantine J Karvellas, Glenda Meeberg, Lai Wei, Yasmina Chouik, Pramod Kumar, Robyn D Gartrell, Mercedes Martinez, Elise Kang, Miguel Sogbe, Bruno Sangro, Birgit Schwacha-Eipper, Andreas Schmiderer, Felix J Krendl, Nicolas Goossens, Stephanie Lacotte, Philippe Compagnon, Christian Toso
{"title":"Determining safe washout period for immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to liver transplantation: An international retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Beat Moeckli, Charles-Henri Wassmer, Sofia El Hajji, Rohan Kumar, Joana Rodrigues Ribeiro, Parissa Tabrizian, Hao Feng, Gabriel Schnickel, Anand V Kulkarni, Manon Allaire, Sonal Asthana, Constantine J Karvellas, Glenda Meeberg, Lai Wei, Yasmina Chouik, Pramod Kumar, Robyn D Gartrell, Mercedes Martinez, Elise Kang, Miguel Sogbe, Bruno Sangro, Birgit Schwacha-Eipper, Andreas Schmiderer, Felix J Krendl, Nicolas Goossens, Stephanie Lacotte, Philippe Compagnon, Christian Toso","doi":"10.1097/HEP.0000000000001289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in patients with advanced HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, concerns about the risk of posttransplant rejection persist.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including 119 HCC patients who received ICIs prior to LT. We analyzed the incidence of allograft rejection, graft loss, and posttransplant recurrence with a particular focus on the washout period between the last ICI dose and LT. In this study, 24 of the 119 (20.2%) patients experienced allograft rejection with a median time to rejection of 9 days (IQR 6-10) post-LT. A linear relationship was observed between shorter washout periods and higher rejection risk. Washout periods <30 days (OR: 21.3, 95% CI: 5.93-103, p< 0.001) and between 30 and 50 days (OR: 9.48, 95% CI 2.47-46.8, p =0.002) were significantly associated with higher rejection rates in the univariate analysis compared to the washout period above 50 days. Graft loss as a result of rejection occurred in 6 patients (25%) with rejection. No factors related to grafts were associated with rejection. A longer washout period was not associated with a lower recurrence-free survival posttransplantation at 36 months (71% vs. 67%, p =0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that a washout period longer than 50 days for ICIs before LT appears to be safe with respect to rejection risk. While these results may help guide clinical decision-making, future prospective studies are essential to establish definitive guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":177,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"1122-1137"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000001289","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in patients with advanced HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, concerns about the risk of posttransplant rejection persist.

Approach and results: We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including 119 HCC patients who received ICIs prior to LT. We analyzed the incidence of allograft rejection, graft loss, and posttransplant recurrence with a particular focus on the washout period between the last ICI dose and LT. In this study, 24 of the 119 (20.2%) patients experienced allograft rejection with a median time to rejection of 9 days (IQR 6-10) post-LT. A linear relationship was observed between shorter washout periods and higher rejection risk. Washout periods <30 days (OR: 21.3, 95% CI: 5.93-103, p< 0.001) and between 30 and 50 days (OR: 9.48, 95% CI 2.47-46.8, p =0.002) were significantly associated with higher rejection rates in the univariate analysis compared to the washout period above 50 days. Graft loss as a result of rejection occurred in 6 patients (25%) with rejection. No factors related to grafts were associated with rejection. A longer washout period was not associated with a lower recurrence-free survival posttransplantation at 36 months (71% vs. 67%, p =0.71).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a washout period longer than 50 days for ICIs before LT appears to be safe with respect to rejection risk. While these results may help guide clinical decision-making, future prospective studies are essential to establish definitive guidelines.

确定肝移植前免疫检查点抑制剂的安全洗脱期:一项国际回顾性队列研究
背景目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)越来越多地用于等待肝移植(LT)的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。然而,对移植后排斥风险的担忧仍然存在。方法:我们进行了一项国际回顾性队列研究,包括119例肝细胞癌患者在肝移植前接受了ICIs。我们分析了同种异体移植排斥、移植物丢失和移植后复发的发生率,特别关注最后一次ICI剂量和肝移植之间的洗脱期。结果:在这项研究中,119例患者中有24例(20.2%)发生同种异体移植排斥,肝移植后中位排斥时间为9天(IQR 6-10)。在较短的洗脱期和较高的排斥风险之间观察到线性关系。洗脱期小于30天(OR 21.3, 95% CI: 5.93-103)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,肝移植前ici的洗脱期大于50天似乎对排斥风险是安全的。虽然这些结果可能有助于指导临床决策,但未来的前瞻性研究对于建立明确的指导方针至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology
Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
609
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: HEPATOLOGY is recognized as the leading publication in the field of liver disease. It features original, peer-reviewed articles covering various aspects of liver structure, function, and disease. The journal's distinguished Editorial Board carefully selects the best articles each month, focusing on topics including immunology, chronic hepatitis, viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, genetic and metabolic liver diseases, liver cancer, and drug metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信