Eve Oostendorp, Karoline Huth, Freek Linders, Judy Luigjes, Anneke E Goudriaan, Ruth J van Holst
{"title":"Systematic review of symptom-level networks of alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Eve Oostendorp, Karoline Huth, Freek Linders, Judy Luigjes, Anneke E Goudriaan, Ruth J van Holst","doi":"10.1111/add.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Network analysis is being used increasingly to study disorders such as alcohol use disorder (AUD) at the level of interacting symptoms. However, it remains unclear what insights AUD symptom networks have brought so far. Therefore, this pre-registered systematic review, following PRISMA reporting guidelines, aimed to collate and critically assess the literature on published AUD symptom networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1608 unique articles were collected from PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and Web of Science between January 2010 and May 2023. A total of six articles were included in the review, comprising seven unique cross-sectional networks. The general characteristics of the symptom networks are summarized (i.e. edge inclusion, whether the connection between nodes is present or absent; and node centrality, the importance of a node within an estimated network) and compared between population versus clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The networks included many edges, with densities ranging from 60% to 100% (mean and mode of 80%, standard deviation of 28%). The edge connecting Tolerance and Time Spent consuming alcohol was most consistently present across samples, while edges connecting to Physical/Psychological Problems were consistently connected only in population samples. Consuming Larger/Longer than intended, and Physical/Psychological Problems had highest strength centrality, while failure to Cut Down and Hazardous Use were consistently lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alcohol use disorder symptom networks tend to be densely interconnected and characterized by a high proportion of included edges (dependencies between variables). Some edges are more consistently found in population samples than in clinical samples and vice versa.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Network analysis is being used increasingly to study disorders such as alcohol use disorder (AUD) at the level of interacting symptoms. However, it remains unclear what insights AUD symptom networks have brought so far. Therefore, this pre-registered systematic review, following PRISMA reporting guidelines, aimed to collate and critically assess the literature on published AUD symptom networks.
Methods: 1608 unique articles were collected from PsycINFO, Medline, Embase and Web of Science between January 2010 and May 2023. A total of six articles were included in the review, comprising seven unique cross-sectional networks. The general characteristics of the symptom networks are summarized (i.e. edge inclusion, whether the connection between nodes is present or absent; and node centrality, the importance of a node within an estimated network) and compared between population versus clinical samples.
Results: The networks included many edges, with densities ranging from 60% to 100% (mean and mode of 80%, standard deviation of 28%). The edge connecting Tolerance and Time Spent consuming alcohol was most consistently present across samples, while edges connecting to Physical/Psychological Problems were consistently connected only in population samples. Consuming Larger/Longer than intended, and Physical/Psychological Problems had highest strength centrality, while failure to Cut Down and Hazardous Use were consistently lowest.
Conclusions: Alcohol use disorder symptom networks tend to be densely interconnected and characterized by a high proportion of included edges (dependencies between variables). Some edges are more consistently found in population samples than in clinical samples and vice versa.
背景和目的:网络分析越来越多地用于研究相互作用症状水平上的障碍,如酒精使用障碍(AUD)。然而,目前尚不清楚AUD症状网络带来了什么见解。因此,本预注册系统综述遵循PRISMA报告指南,旨在整理和批判性评估已发表的AUD症状网络文献。方法:收集2010年1月至2023年5月在PsycINFO、Medline、Embase和Web of Science上发表的1608篇论文。该综述共纳入六篇文章,包括七个独特的横截面网络。总结了症状网络的一般特征(即边缘包含,节点之间的连接是否存在;和节点中心性(估计网络中节点的重要性),并在人群和临床样本之间进行比较。结果:网络包含多条边,密度在60% ~ 100%之间(均值和众数为80%,标准差为28%)。连接容忍度和饮酒时间的边缘在样本中最为一致,而连接身体/心理问题的边缘仅在总体样本中一致。消耗比预期的更大/更长时间和身体/心理问题的强度中心性最高,而失败减少和危险使用的强度中心性最低。结论:酒精使用障碍症状网络往往紧密相连,并以高比例的包含边(变量之间的依赖关系)为特征。在总体样本中比在临床样本中更一致地发现一些边缘,反之亦然。
期刊介绍:
Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines.
Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries.
Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.