Recommendations for future research exploring e-cigarette use and later cigarette smoking in young people: Results from a consultation exercise.

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1111/add.70038
Monserrat Conde, Michael F Pesko, Lion Shahab, Rachna Begh, Nicola Lindson, Sarah E Jackson, Dimitra Kale, Dylan Kneale, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
{"title":"Recommendations for future research exploring e-cigarette use and later cigarette smoking in young people: Results from a consultation exercise.","authors":"Monserrat Conde, Michael F Pesko, Lion Shahab, Rachna Begh, Nicola Lindson, Sarah E Jackson, Dimitra Kale, Dylan Kneale, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce","doi":"10.1111/add.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Exploring the relationship between vaping and smoking in young people is a key area of research that can inform e-cigarette policy. Rigorous evidence mapping and synthesis have highlighted gaps and methodological concerns in the evidence base. This study provides recommendations for the conduct and reporting of future quantitative primary research exploring e-cigarette use and later cigarette smoking in young people (≤29 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a draft version of recommendations based on the critical appraisal of studies, findings of a systematic review and an evidence and gap map. We used an anonymized on-line survey to run a consultation exercise with stakeholders, including researchers, non-profit/charity workers and clinicians. Respondents rated the perceived importance of each draft recommendation on a 5-point Likert scale and provided open-ended comments, where relevant. We developed a final set of recommendations based on this stakeholder input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially came up with a list of 22 recommendations, which 36 stakeholders rated in the on-line survey. Most were researchers (n = 26) and from the USA (n = 18). Following feedback, this resulted in a final set of 23 recommendations, including recommendations for planning, data collection, data analysis and reporting. Examining causes of differences in vaping-smoking associations, including equity factors (e.g. socioeconomic status) and contextual factors (e.g. jurisdiction levels), and generating representative longitudinal data from countries other than the USA, Canada and UK, particularly low- and middle-income countries, were strongly endorsed recommendations. A new recommendation to report characteristics of e-cigarettes (e.g. flavours) was added.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides 23 recommendations for conducting and reporting future quantitative research exploring e-cigarette use/availability and later combustible cigarette smoking in young people. Most of the recommendations are specific to studies using repeat cross-sectional data tracking population trends and to longitudinal cohort studies tracking behaviours in individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Exploring the relationship between vaping and smoking in young people is a key area of research that can inform e-cigarette policy. Rigorous evidence mapping and synthesis have highlighted gaps and methodological concerns in the evidence base. This study provides recommendations for the conduct and reporting of future quantitative primary research exploring e-cigarette use and later cigarette smoking in young people (≤29 years).

Methods: We developed a draft version of recommendations based on the critical appraisal of studies, findings of a systematic review and an evidence and gap map. We used an anonymized on-line survey to run a consultation exercise with stakeholders, including researchers, non-profit/charity workers and clinicians. Respondents rated the perceived importance of each draft recommendation on a 5-point Likert scale and provided open-ended comments, where relevant. We developed a final set of recommendations based on this stakeholder input.

Results: We initially came up with a list of 22 recommendations, which 36 stakeholders rated in the on-line survey. Most were researchers (n = 26) and from the USA (n = 18). Following feedback, this resulted in a final set of 23 recommendations, including recommendations for planning, data collection, data analysis and reporting. Examining causes of differences in vaping-smoking associations, including equity factors (e.g. socioeconomic status) and contextual factors (e.g. jurisdiction levels), and generating representative longitudinal data from countries other than the USA, Canada and UK, particularly low- and middle-income countries, were strongly endorsed recommendations. A new recommendation to report characteristics of e-cigarettes (e.g. flavours) was added.

Conclusions: This study provides 23 recommendations for conducting and reporting future quantitative research exploring e-cigarette use/availability and later combustible cigarette smoking in young people. Most of the recommendations are specific to studies using repeat cross-sectional data tracking population trends and to longitudinal cohort studies tracking behaviours in individuals.

对未来探索年轻人使用电子烟和后来吸烟的研究的建议:咨询活动的结果。
背景和目的:探索年轻人吸电子烟和吸烟之间的关系是一个关键的研究领域,可以为电子烟政策提供信息。严格的证据制图和综合突出了证据基础中的差距和方法问题。本研究为未来探索年轻人(≤29岁)使用电子烟和后来吸烟的定量初步研究的进行和报告提供了建议。方法:我们根据对研究的批判性评价、系统评价的结果以及证据和差距图制定了建议草案。我们采用匿名的在线调查方式,与包括研究人员、非营利/慈善工作者和临床医生在内的利益相关者进行咨询。受访者以5分李克特量表对每个建议草案的感知重要性进行评级,并在相关情况下提供开放式评论。我们根据涉众的意见制定了一套最终的建议。结果:我们最初提出了22条建议,36名利益相关者在在线调查中对其进行了评分。大多数是研究人员(n = 26),来自美国(n = 18)。根据反馈意见,最后提出了23项建议,包括关于规划、数据收集、数据分析和报告的建议。研究电子烟相关差异的原因,包括公平因素(如社会经济地位)和背景因素(如司法级别),并从美国、加拿大和英国以外的国家,特别是低收入和中等收入国家获得具有代表性的纵向数据,这些建议得到了强烈支持。增加了一项报告电子烟特征(如口味)的新建议。结论:本研究提供了23条建议,用于开展和报告未来的定量研究,探索电子烟的使用/可用性和后来的可燃香烟在年轻人中的使用。大多数建议是针对使用重复横断面数据跟踪人口趋势的研究和跟踪个人行为的纵向队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信