Amendments and seeding did not augment erosion control structure effectiveness in dry rangelands

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70105
Eva Stricker, Megan O'Connell
{"title":"Amendments and seeding did not augment erosion control structure effectiveness in dry rangelands","authors":"Eva Stricker,&nbsp;Megan O'Connell","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rangelands in the Western United States are crucial for providing ecosystem services and supporting rural food systems, but they face increased degradation from erosion. Existing erosion management activities leverage physical interventions such as rock structures, but little is known as to whether biological interventions such as seeding or organic amendments may enhance soil health and augment the effects of such rock structures. This study investigates the effectiveness of combining rock structures with organic amendments (wood mulch or compost) and native perennial grass seed addition to address erosion on rangelands. The study was conducted across five cattle ranches in New Mexico with 9–18 active head cuts studied at each ranch. Rock rundown structures were built at each headcut and a plot above each structure received an organic amendment treatment (compost, mulch, or control) and seed addition treatment (seeded or control). Across sites, we found none of the seed additions resulted in plant establishment; therefore, we aggregated all seed addition treatments and focused only on organic amendments and measured soil and vegetation characteristics after one year. Consistently, the rock structures themselves led to channel accretion, but organic amendments had no significant effect on infiltration rate, aggregate stability, channel erosion/accretion, aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, plant richness, or soil organic carbon. Our results indicate that rock structures are an effective solution for addressing small headcuts on arid rangelands but organic amendments and native seed addition were not effective on this time scale, potentially due to severe drought during much of the year in the region. Ranchers and field technicians noted trends of enhanced soil moisture in the amendments compared with controls and were thus interested in pursuing further investigation in amendments in the future, despite the lack of effect in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rangelands in the Western United States are crucial for providing ecosystem services and supporting rural food systems, but they face increased degradation from erosion. Existing erosion management activities leverage physical interventions such as rock structures, but little is known as to whether biological interventions such as seeding or organic amendments may enhance soil health and augment the effects of such rock structures. This study investigates the effectiveness of combining rock structures with organic amendments (wood mulch or compost) and native perennial grass seed addition to address erosion on rangelands. The study was conducted across five cattle ranches in New Mexico with 9–18 active head cuts studied at each ranch. Rock rundown structures were built at each headcut and a plot above each structure received an organic amendment treatment (compost, mulch, or control) and seed addition treatment (seeded or control). Across sites, we found none of the seed additions resulted in plant establishment; therefore, we aggregated all seed addition treatments and focused only on organic amendments and measured soil and vegetation characteristics after one year. Consistently, the rock structures themselves led to channel accretion, but organic amendments had no significant effect on infiltration rate, aggregate stability, channel erosion/accretion, aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, plant richness, or soil organic carbon. Our results indicate that rock structures are an effective solution for addressing small headcuts on arid rangelands but organic amendments and native seed addition were not effective on this time scale, potentially due to severe drought during much of the year in the region. Ranchers and field technicians noted trends of enhanced soil moisture in the amendments compared with controls and were thus interested in pursuing further investigation in amendments in the future, despite the lack of effect in this study.

Abstract Image

改良和播种并不能提高旱地侵蚀控制结构的有效性
美国西部的牧场对提供生态系统服务和支持农村粮食系统至关重要,但它们面临着日益严重的侵蚀退化。现有的侵蚀管理活动利用岩石结构等物理干预措施,但很少有人知道诸如播种或有机修正等生物干预措施是否可以增强土壤健康并增强此类岩石结构的影响。本研究探讨了将岩石结构与有机改良剂(木膜或堆肥)和本地多年生草籽结合起来解决牧场侵蚀问题的有效性。这项研究在新墨西哥州的五个牧场进行,每个牧场研究了9-18个活跃的头部切割。在每个头部切口处建造岩石破旧结构,每个结构上方的地块接受有机修正处理(堆肥,覆盖物或对照)和种子添加处理(播种或对照)。在不同的地点,我们没有发现添加种子导致植物建立;因此,我们汇总了所有添加种子处理,只关注有机修正,并在一年后测量土壤和植被特征。同样,岩石结构本身导致河道增生,但有机修正对入渗速率、团聚体稳定性、河道侵蚀/增生、地上生物量、植被覆盖度、植物丰富度或土壤有机碳没有显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,岩石结构是解决干旱牧场小切口的有效解决方案,但有机修正和本地种子添加在这个时间尺度上无效,可能是由于该地区一年中的大部分时间都严重干旱。牧场主和田间技术人员注意到,与对照相比,改良剂有提高土壤湿度的趋势,因此有兴趣在未来对改良剂进行进一步调查,尽管本研究缺乏效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信