The Potential for Twice-Annual Influenza Vaccination to Reduce Disease Burden

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Shuyi Zhong, Mark G. Thompson, Benjamin J. Cowling
{"title":"The Potential for Twice-Annual Influenza Vaccination to Reduce Disease Burden","authors":"Shuyi Zhong,&nbsp;Mark G. Thompson,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Cowling","doi":"10.1111/irv.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Influenza vaccination is recommended annually based on the evolving nature of influenza viruses and the waning of vaccine-induced immunity. The timing of vaccination is usually before the winter influenza season in most temperate locations, where the seasonality is clear and influenza activities on average last no longer than 6 months. However, many tropical and subtropical areas have year-round influenza activity and multiple epidemics within 1 year, against which annual influenza vaccination may not offer sufficient protection at the individual level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>A twice-annual vaccination program could utilize standard inactivated influenza vaccines or enhanced influenza vaccines. Here, we discuss three reasons to consider twice-annual vaccination as a strategy to improve protection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The first, mentioned above, is that some locations experience prolonged or year-round influenza activity. The second reason is based on the observation that vaccine effectiveness significantly declines about 6 months after vaccination particularly for A(H3N2) strains, and therefore, vaccination twice a year might be beneficial to maintain a higher level of immunity in the second half of each year. The third reason is to allow for receipt of the most updated vaccine strains, given that these are updated twice each year by the World Health Organization. We also discuss three potential barriers or challenges. The first potential challenge is knowledge gaps, because there are very few existing studies that used twice-annual vaccination. The second potential barrier is a concern over whether more frequent vaccination would lead to reduced immunogenicity or reduced clinical protection in the longer term. The third relates to concerns about cost or feasibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We discuss these issues and recommend comparative assessment of the incremental benefits and cost of twice-annual vaccination versus annual vaccination, as well as other vaccination strategies aiming to reduce influenza disease burden particularly in tropical and subtropical locations where there can be year-round influenza activity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13544,"journal":{"name":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irv.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Influenza vaccination is recommended annually based on the evolving nature of influenza viruses and the waning of vaccine-induced immunity. The timing of vaccination is usually before the winter influenza season in most temperate locations, where the seasonality is clear and influenza activities on average last no longer than 6 months. However, many tropical and subtropical areas have year-round influenza activity and multiple epidemics within 1 year, against which annual influenza vaccination may not offer sufficient protection at the individual level.

Aims

A twice-annual vaccination program could utilize standard inactivated influenza vaccines or enhanced influenza vaccines. Here, we discuss three reasons to consider twice-annual vaccination as a strategy to improve protection.

Discussion

The first, mentioned above, is that some locations experience prolonged or year-round influenza activity. The second reason is based on the observation that vaccine effectiveness significantly declines about 6 months after vaccination particularly for A(H3N2) strains, and therefore, vaccination twice a year might be beneficial to maintain a higher level of immunity in the second half of each year. The third reason is to allow for receipt of the most updated vaccine strains, given that these are updated twice each year by the World Health Organization. We also discuss three potential barriers or challenges. The first potential challenge is knowledge gaps, because there are very few existing studies that used twice-annual vaccination. The second potential barrier is a concern over whether more frequent vaccination would lead to reduced immunogenicity or reduced clinical protection in the longer term. The third relates to concerns about cost or feasibility.

Conclusion

We discuss these issues and recommend comparative assessment of the incremental benefits and cost of twice-annual vaccination versus annual vaccination, as well as other vaccination strategies aiming to reduce influenza disease burden particularly in tropical and subtropical locations where there can be year-round influenza activity.

Abstract Image

每年接种两次流感疫苗以减轻疾病负担的潜力
背景:根据流感病毒的演变性质和疫苗引起的免疫力减弱,建议每年接种流感疫苗。在大多数温带地区,接种疫苗的时间通常在冬季流感季节之前,那里的季节性很明显,流感活动平均持续时间不超过6个月。然而,许多热带和亚热带地区全年都有流感活动,一年内多次流行,每年接种流感疫苗可能无法在个人层面提供足够的保护。目的一年两次的疫苗接种计划可以使用标准灭活流感疫苗或强化流感疫苗。在这里,我们讨论了考虑每年两次接种疫苗作为提高保护的策略的三个原因。首先,如上所述,一些地区经历了长时间或全年的流感活动。第二个原因是,根据观察,疫苗效力在接种后约6个月显著下降,特别是对A(H3N2)株,因此,每年接种两次疫苗可能有利于在每年下半年保持较高的免疫水平。第三个原因是允许接收最新的疫苗株,因为这些疫苗株每年由世界卫生组织更新两次。我们还讨论了三个潜在的障碍或挑战。第一个潜在挑战是知识差距,因为很少有现有的研究使用每年两次的疫苗接种。第二个潜在障碍是对更频繁的疫苗接种是否会导致免疫原性降低或长期临床保护降低的担忧。第三个问题与成本或可行性有关。我们讨论了这些问题,并建议对每年两次疫苗接种与每年一次疫苗接种的增量效益和成本进行比较评估,以及旨在减轻流感疾病负担的其他疫苗接种策略,特别是在可能存在全年流感活动的热带和亚热带地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is the official journal of the International Society of Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Diseases - an independent scientific professional society - dedicated to promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus diseases. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is an Open Access journal. Copyright on any research article published by Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Wiley a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信