Yifan Mao, Kai Li, Jizhe Li, Xian Zhang, Jing-Li Fan
{"title":"Spatial Heterogeneity of Plant-Level CCUS Investment Decisions in China's Cement Industry Under Various Policy Incentives","authors":"Yifan Mao, Kai Li, Jizhe Li, Xian Zhang, Jing-Li Fan","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is widely regarded as a critical technology for achieving deep decarbonization in the cement industry. However, limited research has focused on its plant-level CCUS investment decisions, especially considering geographic heterogeneity based on the national source-sink matching optimization. This study develops an integrated framework that combines source-sink matching with a real option model to investigate CCUS investment decisions under various incentive policies. The findings show that the critical carbon price varies significantly across regions in China, ranging from 55 to 950 CNY/<i>t</i>, with 297 (46% of retrofittable cement plants) falling between 600 and 800 CNY/<i>t</i>. Northeast China, benefiting from favorable storage conditions and enhanced oil recovery, exhibits a lower average critical carbon price of 104 CNY/<i>t</i>. In contrast, Central China, despite its substantial CO<sub>2</sub> storage amount (18% of the national total), encounters a higher average critical carbon price of 564 CNY/<i>t</i> CO<sub>2</sub> due to significant source-sink matching distances. Notably, the offshore saline aquifer storage in the Southeastern coast could account for 17% of the national total, corresponding to an average critical carbon price of 660 CNY/t. Furthermore, implementing different policy incentives can enhance the immediate adoption of CCUS from 93 to 294 (13% to 46% of retrofittable cement plants).</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004951","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is widely regarded as a critical technology for achieving deep decarbonization in the cement industry. However, limited research has focused on its plant-level CCUS investment decisions, especially considering geographic heterogeneity based on the national source-sink matching optimization. This study develops an integrated framework that combines source-sink matching with a real option model to investigate CCUS investment decisions under various incentive policies. The findings show that the critical carbon price varies significantly across regions in China, ranging from 55 to 950 CNY/t, with 297 (46% of retrofittable cement plants) falling between 600 and 800 CNY/t. Northeast China, benefiting from favorable storage conditions and enhanced oil recovery, exhibits a lower average critical carbon price of 104 CNY/t. In contrast, Central China, despite its substantial CO2 storage amount (18% of the national total), encounters a higher average critical carbon price of 564 CNY/t CO2 due to significant source-sink matching distances. Notably, the offshore saline aquifer storage in the Southeastern coast could account for 17% of the national total, corresponding to an average critical carbon price of 660 CNY/t. Furthermore, implementing different policy incentives can enhance the immediate adoption of CCUS from 93 to 294 (13% to 46% of retrofittable cement plants).
期刊介绍:
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.