Diaphragm thickness and physical performance in regular smokers and non-smokers: A pilot study

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Bahar Özgül, Zübeyir Sarı, İlkşan Demirbüken, Hilal Başak Can, Zana Gezer, Halil Yıldırım, Mine Gülden Polat
{"title":"Diaphragm thickness and physical performance in regular smokers and non-smokers: A pilot study","authors":"Bahar Özgül,&nbsp;Zübeyir Sarı,&nbsp;İlkşan Demirbüken,&nbsp;Hilal Başak Can,&nbsp;Zana Gezer,&nbsp;Halil Yıldırım,&nbsp;Mine Gülden Polat","doi":"10.1111/cpf.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the understanding of the role of diaphragm role as a crucial element in trunk stabilizer performance, limited research has been carried out on the diaphragmatic features particularly in smoking population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>It was aimed to compare the diaphragm structure beside trunk stabilizer performance &amp; body balance of young regular smokers and non-smokers and investigate the relationship between diaphragmatic features and physical performance in regular smokers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Asymptomatic regular smoker (<i>n</i> = 22) and nonsmoker (<i>n</i> = 22) young male subjects (21.63 ± 2.37 years) were participated to the study. The diaphragmatic ultrasonic scanning and physical performance tests of core muscle strength and endurance &amp; Y balance test were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The duration of prone and lateral side bridge (<i>t</i> = −3.347, <i>t</i> = 3.477, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and modify push-up test repetition (<i>Z</i> = −2.213, <i>p</i> = 0.027) were detected lower in regular smokers. A positive moderate correlation was observed between the duration of the prone bridge test and the maximum inspiration thickness &amp; the thickness difference at inspiration and expiration (<i>r</i> = 0.545, <i>p</i> = 0.009 &amp; <i>r</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and between the number of repetitions of the modify push-up and the maximum expiration thickness (<i>r</i> = 0.530, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While no difference was detected in terms of the diaphragm structure between groups, trunk stabilizer performance was lower and greater diaphragm thickness was associated with better trunk stability in some performance tasks in smokers. While the diaphragm muscle structure, which is the main respiratory muscle, does not differ in young smokers, the effects of the diaphragm muscle on general body biomechanics have been preliminary demonstrated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the understanding of the role of diaphragm role as a crucial element in trunk stabilizer performance, limited research has been carried out on the diaphragmatic features particularly in smoking population.

Objectives

It was aimed to compare the diaphragm structure beside trunk stabilizer performance & body balance of young regular smokers and non-smokers and investigate the relationship between diaphragmatic features and physical performance in regular smokers.

Methods

Asymptomatic regular smoker (n = 22) and nonsmoker (n = 22) young male subjects (21.63 ± 2.37 years) were participated to the study. The diaphragmatic ultrasonic scanning and physical performance tests of core muscle strength and endurance & Y balance test were performed.

Results

The duration of prone and lateral side bridge (t = −3.347, t = 3.477, p < 0.001), and modify push-up test repetition (Z = −2.213, p = 0.027) were detected lower in regular smokers. A positive moderate correlation was observed between the duration of the prone bridge test and the maximum inspiration thickness & the thickness difference at inspiration and expiration (r = 0.545, p = 0.009 & r = 0.468, p = 0.028) and between the number of repetitions of the modify push-up and the maximum expiration thickness (r = 0.530, p = 0.011).

Conclusion

While no difference was detected in terms of the diaphragm structure between groups, trunk stabilizer performance was lower and greater diaphragm thickness was associated with better trunk stability in some performance tasks in smokers. While the diaphragm muscle structure, which is the main respiratory muscle, does not differ in young smokers, the effects of the diaphragm muscle on general body biomechanics have been preliminary demonstrated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信