Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70092
Jun Noda, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Naotaka Maruoka, Masatsugu Nagahama
{"title":"Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study","authors":"Jun Noda,&nbsp;Yuichi Takano,&nbsp;Naoki Tamai,&nbsp;Masataka Yamawaki,&nbsp;Tetsushi Azami,&nbsp;Fumitaka Niiya,&nbsp;Naotaka Maruoka,&nbsp;Masatsugu Nagahama","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) caused by pancreatic cancer often complicates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), particularly biliary cannulation. While various factors influencing difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) have been studied, data specific to pancreatic cancer-related distant malignant biliary obstruction#x000A0;remains limited. This study identifies factors affecting ERCP success in this patient population to improve clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed 119 ERCP procedures for distant malignant biliary obstruction owing to pancreatic cancer with naïve papilla at Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital (January 2020–September 2024). Patient characteristics, duodenal invasion, ampullary bile duct status, papillary morphology, trainee involvement, and adverse events were evaluated. Multivariate analysis identified predictive factors of DBC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After excluding 17 ERCP failures, 102 patients were analyzed and categorized into non-DBC (<i>n</i> = 40) and DBC (<i>n</i> = 62) groups. The DBC incidence rate was 60.8%. The absence of the ampullary bile duct (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–6.51; <i>p</i> = 0.04) and the macroscopic appearance of type III papillary morphology (enlarged/protruding; OR: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.07–10.30; <i>p</i> = 0.04) were significantly associated with DBC. Adverse events were slightly more frequent in the DBC group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Alternative cannulation was performed more often in patients without the ampullary bile duct; however, no difference in adverse events was observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The absence of the ampullary bile duct and type III papillary morphology are anatomical risk factors for DBC during ERCP for patients with pancreatic cancer. Early consideration of alternative cannulation techniques or biliary drainage methods may be necessary for such patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) caused by pancreatic cancer often complicates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), particularly biliary cannulation. While various factors influencing difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) have been studied, data specific to pancreatic cancer-related distant malignant biliary obstruction#x000A0;remains limited. This study identifies factors affecting ERCP success in this patient population to improve clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 119 ERCP procedures for distant malignant biliary obstruction owing to pancreatic cancer with naïve papilla at Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital (January 2020–September 2024). Patient characteristics, duodenal invasion, ampullary bile duct status, papillary morphology, trainee involvement, and adverse events were evaluated. Multivariate analysis identified predictive factors of DBC.

Results

After excluding 17 ERCP failures, 102 patients were analyzed and categorized into non-DBC (n = 40) and DBC (n = 62) groups. The DBC incidence rate was 60.8%. The absence of the ampullary bile duct (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–6.51; p = 0.04) and the macroscopic appearance of type III papillary morphology (enlarged/protruding; OR: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.07–10.30; p = 0.04) were significantly associated with DBC. Adverse events were slightly more frequent in the DBC group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Alternative cannulation was performed more often in patients without the ampullary bile duct; however, no difference in adverse events was observed.

Conclusions

The absence of the ampullary bile duct and type III papillary morphology are anatomical risk factors for DBC during ERCP for patients with pancreatic cancer. Early consideration of alternative cannulation techniques or biliary drainage methods may be necessary for such patients.

Abstract Image

内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胰腺癌远端恶性胆道梗阻时胆道插管困难:一项观察性研究
目的胰腺癌引起的远端恶性胆道梗阻(DMBO)常并发内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP),尤其是胆道插管。虽然对影响胆道插管困难(DBC)的各种因素进行了研究,但胰腺癌相关远处恶性胆道梗阻的特异性数据仍然有限。本研究确定了影响ERCP成功的因素,以改善该患者群体的临床结果。方法回顾性分析2020年1月- 2024年9月在昭和大学福冈医院(Fujigaoka Hospital)进行的119例胰腺癌伴naïve乳头的远处恶性胆道梗阻ERCP手术。评估患者特征、十二指肠侵犯、壶腹胆管状态、乳头形态、受训者受累情况和不良事件。多变量分析确定了DBC的预测因素。结果排除17例ERCP失败后,将102例患者分为非DBC组(n = 40)和DBC组(n = 62)。DBC的发生率为60.8%。壶腹胆管缺失(优势比[OR]: 2.58, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.02-6.51;p = 0.04)和III型乳头形态的宏观外观(增大/突出;OR: 3.32;95% ci: 1.07-10.30;p = 0.04)与DBC显著相关。DBC组不良事件发生率略高;然而,这种差异在统计学上并不显著。没有壶腹胆管的患者多行替代插管;然而,在不良事件方面没有观察到差异。结论壶腹胆管缺失和III型乳头形态是胰腺癌ERCP术中DBC发生的解剖学危险因素。对于此类患者,早期考虑其他插管技术或胆道引流方法可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信