Capability of Photochemical Reflectance Index to Track Maize Canopy Radiation Use Efficiency and Its Drivers Under Soil Drying

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Huailin Zhou, Qijin He, Guangsheng Zhou, Xingyang Song
{"title":"Capability of Photochemical Reflectance Index to Track Maize Canopy Radiation Use Efficiency and Its Drivers Under Soil Drying","authors":"Huailin Zhou,&nbsp;Qijin He,&nbsp;Guangsheng Zhou,&nbsp;Xingyang Song","doi":"10.1111/jac.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has been a promising indicator for estimating vegetation photosynthetic efficiency. However, its capability to track drought stress-induced changes in canopy radiation use efficiency (RUE) and the underlying mechanisms remains insufficiently explored, largely due to the confounding effects of soil background and canopy characteristics. This study aimed to explain how the canopy PRI responds to drought stress and quantify the relative contributions of soil moisture and canopy characteristics to its variability. Using maize field experimental data across varying drought treatments, we found that drought significantly altered the PRI-RUE relationship, with canopy PRI exhibiting a stronger correlation with RUE under increasing soil drying. This enhancement in the PRI-RUE relationship was primarily attributed to changes in canopy structure and physiological characteristics. Specifically, the fraction of absorbed photosynthetic available radiation (fAPAR), canopy water content (CWC) and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) were more related to PRI than leaf area index (LAI). While available soil water content (ASWC) was not directly linked to PRI, a positive linear relationship emerged after accounting for the effects of canopy characteristics, particularly fAPAR. Furthermore, fAPAR and LAI were identified as the most important direct and indirect factors influencing canopy PRI, respectively. These findings underscore the importance of considering fAPAR's contribution to accurately estimate photosynthetic efficiency and monitor crop stress under soil drying scenarios. By demonstrating how drought strengthens the PRI-RUE relationship and elucidating its underlying mechanisms, this study provides insights for improving crop stress monitoring and photosynthetic capacity assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) has been a promising indicator for estimating vegetation photosynthetic efficiency. However, its capability to track drought stress-induced changes in canopy radiation use efficiency (RUE) and the underlying mechanisms remains insufficiently explored, largely due to the confounding effects of soil background and canopy characteristics. This study aimed to explain how the canopy PRI responds to drought stress and quantify the relative contributions of soil moisture and canopy characteristics to its variability. Using maize field experimental data across varying drought treatments, we found that drought significantly altered the PRI-RUE relationship, with canopy PRI exhibiting a stronger correlation with RUE under increasing soil drying. This enhancement in the PRI-RUE relationship was primarily attributed to changes in canopy structure and physiological characteristics. Specifically, the fraction of absorbed photosynthetic available radiation (fAPAR), canopy water content (CWC) and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) were more related to PRI than leaf area index (LAI). While available soil water content (ASWC) was not directly linked to PRI, a positive linear relationship emerged after accounting for the effects of canopy characteristics, particularly fAPAR. Furthermore, fAPAR and LAI were identified as the most important direct and indirect factors influencing canopy PRI, respectively. These findings underscore the importance of considering fAPAR's contribution to accurately estimate photosynthetic efficiency and monitor crop stress under soil drying scenarios. By demonstrating how drought strengthens the PRI-RUE relationship and elucidating its underlying mechanisms, this study provides insights for improving crop stress monitoring and photosynthetic capacity assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信