Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Disability and Rehabilitation Policy Implementation in Gauteng, South Africa: A Qualitative CFIR-Informed Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Naeema Ahmad Ramadan Hussein El Kout, Sonti Pilusa, Natalie Benjamin-Damons, Juliana Kagura
{"title":"Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Disability and Rehabilitation Policy Implementation in Gauteng, South Africa: A Qualitative CFIR-Informed Study","authors":"Naeema Ahmad Ramadan Hussein El Kout,&nbsp;Sonti Pilusa,&nbsp;Natalie Benjamin-Damons,&nbsp;Juliana Kagura","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The effective implementation of disability and rehabilitation frameworks is essential for the full participation and social integration of individuals with disabilities. In Gauteng, South Africa, significant challenges persist in the execution of the Framework and Strategy for Disability and Rehabilitation (FSDR). This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the FSDR in Gauteng.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We employed qualitative research methods, including semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders involved in the implementation process, from management to end users. Data were triangulated with a review of paper-based implementation reports from rehabilitation managers. The interview, focus group, and document review data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers to implementation included resource constraints, organizational inefficiencies, and socio-cultural attitudes toward disability. Facilitators identified included inter-sectoral collaboration, community engagement, and alignment of policies with international guidelines. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), barriers and facilitators were mapped to domains such as intervention characteristics, outer and inner setting factors, characteristics of individuals, and the implementation process. Key challenges included insufficient awareness and training among healthcare professionals, limited resources, safety concerns, and inconsistent policy implementation. Facilitators such as inter-sectoral collaboration, policy development, provincial training, and advocacy by persons with disabilities were crucial for overcoming these challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides valuable insights into the contextual factors influencing disability and rehabilitation policy implementation in Gauteng. By addressing identified barriers and leveraging facilitators, evidence-based strategies can strengthen rehabilitation services, promote social inclusion, and enhance the rights of individuals with disabilities in South Africa and globally.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70515","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The effective implementation of disability and rehabilitation frameworks is essential for the full participation and social integration of individuals with disabilities. In Gauteng, South Africa, significant challenges persist in the execution of the Framework and Strategy for Disability and Rehabilitation (FSDR). This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the FSDR in Gauteng.

Methods

We employed qualitative research methods, including semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders involved in the implementation process, from management to end users. Data were triangulated with a review of paper-based implementation reports from rehabilitation managers. The interview, focus group, and document review data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis with MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software.

Results

Barriers to implementation included resource constraints, organizational inefficiencies, and socio-cultural attitudes toward disability. Facilitators identified included inter-sectoral collaboration, community engagement, and alignment of policies with international guidelines. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), barriers and facilitators were mapped to domains such as intervention characteristics, outer and inner setting factors, characteristics of individuals, and the implementation process. Key challenges included insufficient awareness and training among healthcare professionals, limited resources, safety concerns, and inconsistent policy implementation. Facilitators such as inter-sectoral collaboration, policy development, provincial training, and advocacy by persons with disabilities were crucial for overcoming these challenges.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the contextual factors influencing disability and rehabilitation policy implementation in Gauteng. By addressing identified barriers and leveraging facilitators, evidence-based strategies can strengthen rehabilitation services, promote social inclusion, and enhance the rights of individuals with disabilities in South Africa and globally.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信