{"title":"An Inverse Parameter Identification in Finite Element Problems Using Machine Learning-Aided Optimization Framework","authors":"A. Tariq, B. Deliktaş","doi":"10.1007/s11340-024-01136-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The ability of finite element analysis to produce high fidelity results is greatly dependent on quality of constitutive model and the accuracy of their parameters. As such, the calibration of phenomenological constitutive models to replicate real-world behaviors has remained a focal point of many research works.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>A new inverse identification approach combining numerical-experimental methods and data-driven techniques to characterize the nonlinear response of materials using a single experiment is proposed.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This approach integrates finite element analysis, optimization methods and machine learning techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Regression, to accurately determine model parameters while significantly reducing computational time. This approach can be used to characterize a wide range of models irrespective of the number of parameters involved. A detailed flowchart of the methodology focusing on its implementation aspects is provided and its each module is explained.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The proposed model calibration approach successfully identified eight parameters for a cohesive zone model implemented in user element subroutine (UEL), four parameters for a hardening model implemented in user material subroutine (UMAT), and five parameters for a Johnson–Cook plasticity model. In all cases, this method achieved an excellent fit between the simulation and experimental results. Moreover, it demonstrated a significant improvement in efficiency, being 2–3 times faster than traditional optimization algorithms in determining optimal parameters.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Based on the presented investigations, the proposed machine learning-based inverse method can significantly accelerate the parameter identification procedure and can be extended to a wide range of material models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"65 3","pages":"325 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-024-01136-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The ability of finite element analysis to produce high fidelity results is greatly dependent on quality of constitutive model and the accuracy of their parameters. As such, the calibration of phenomenological constitutive models to replicate real-world behaviors has remained a focal point of many research works.
Objective
A new inverse identification approach combining numerical-experimental methods and data-driven techniques to characterize the nonlinear response of materials using a single experiment is proposed.
Methods
This approach integrates finite element analysis, optimization methods and machine learning techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Regression, to accurately determine model parameters while significantly reducing computational time. This approach can be used to characterize a wide range of models irrespective of the number of parameters involved. A detailed flowchart of the methodology focusing on its implementation aspects is provided and its each module is explained.
Results
The proposed model calibration approach successfully identified eight parameters for a cohesive zone model implemented in user element subroutine (UEL), four parameters for a hardening model implemented in user material subroutine (UMAT), and five parameters for a Johnson–Cook plasticity model. In all cases, this method achieved an excellent fit between the simulation and experimental results. Moreover, it demonstrated a significant improvement in efficiency, being 2–3 times faster than traditional optimization algorithms in determining optimal parameters.
Conclusions
Based on the presented investigations, the proposed machine learning-based inverse method can significantly accelerate the parameter identification procedure and can be extended to a wide range of material models.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome.
Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.