Cosmological distance forecasts for the CSST Galaxy Survey using BAO peaks

IF 6.4 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Feng Shi, Jieyi Tian, Zhejie Ding, Xiaohu Yang, Yizhou Gu, Christoph Saulder, Xiaoping Li, Yanming Liu, Zitong Wang, Hu Zhan, Ming Li, Xiaolei Li, Hong Guo, Yan Gong, Yunkun Han, Cheng Li, Yipeng Jing, Jipeng Sui, Run Wen, Gong-Bo Zhao, Hu Zou, Pengjie Zhang, Xianzhong Zheng, Xingchen Zhou
{"title":"Cosmological distance forecasts for the CSST Galaxy Survey using BAO peaks","authors":"Feng Shi,&nbsp;Jieyi Tian,&nbsp;Zhejie Ding,&nbsp;Xiaohu Yang,&nbsp;Yizhou Gu,&nbsp;Christoph Saulder,&nbsp;Xiaoping Li,&nbsp;Yanming Liu,&nbsp;Zitong Wang,&nbsp;Hu Zhan,&nbsp;Ming Li,&nbsp;Xiaolei Li,&nbsp;Hong Guo,&nbsp;Yan Gong,&nbsp;Yunkun Han,&nbsp;Cheng Li,&nbsp;Yipeng Jing,&nbsp;Jipeng Sui,&nbsp;Run Wen,&nbsp;Gong-Bo Zhao,&nbsp;Hu Zou,&nbsp;Pengjie Zhang,&nbsp;Xianzhong Zheng,&nbsp;Xingchen Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11433-024-2603-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The measurement of cosmological distances using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) is crucial for studying the universe’s expansion. The China Space Station Telescope (CSST) galaxy redshift survey, with its vast volume and sky coverage, provides an opportunity to address key challenges in cosmology. However, redshift uncertainties in galaxy surveys can degrade both angular and radial distance estimates. In this study, we forecast the precision of BAO distance measurements using mock CSST galaxy samples, applying a two-point correlation function (2PCF) wedge approach to mitigate redshift errors. We simulate redshift uncertainties of <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub> = 0.003 and <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub> = 0.006, representative of expected CSST errors, and examine their effects on the BAO peak and distance scaling factors, <i>α</i><sub>⊥</sub> and <i>α</i><sub>∥</sub>, across redshift bins within 0.0 &lt; <i>z</i> ⩽ 1.0. The wedge 2PCF method proves more effective in detecting the BAO peak compared with the monopole 2PCF, particularly for <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub> = 0.006. Constraints on the BAO peaks show that <i>α</i><sub>⊥</sub> is well constrained around 1.0, regardless of <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub>, with precision between 1% and 3% across redshift bins. In contrast, <i>α</i><sub>∥</sub> measurements are more sensitive to increases in <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub>. For <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub> = 0.003, the results remain close to the fiducial value, with uncertainties ranging between 4% and 9%; for <i>σ</i><sub>0</sub> = 0.006, significant deviations from the fiducial value are observed. We also study the ability to measure parameters (Ω<sub><i>m</i></sub>, <i>H</i><sub>0</sub><i>r</i><sub>d</sub>) using distance measurements, proving robust constraints as a cosmological probe under CSST-like redshift uncertainties. These findings demonstrate that the CSST survey enables few-percent precision measurements of <i>D</i><sub><i>A</i></sub> using the wedge 2PCF method, highlighting its potential to place tight constraints on the universe’s expansion history and contribute to high-precision cosmological studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":774,"journal":{"name":"Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy","volume":"68 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11433-024-2603-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The measurement of cosmological distances using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) is crucial for studying the universe’s expansion. The China Space Station Telescope (CSST) galaxy redshift survey, with its vast volume and sky coverage, provides an opportunity to address key challenges in cosmology. However, redshift uncertainties in galaxy surveys can degrade both angular and radial distance estimates. In this study, we forecast the precision of BAO distance measurements using mock CSST galaxy samples, applying a two-point correlation function (2PCF) wedge approach to mitigate redshift errors. We simulate redshift uncertainties of σ0 = 0.003 and σ0 = 0.006, representative of expected CSST errors, and examine their effects on the BAO peak and distance scaling factors, α and α, across redshift bins within 0.0 < z ⩽ 1.0. The wedge 2PCF method proves more effective in detecting the BAO peak compared with the monopole 2PCF, particularly for σ0 = 0.006. Constraints on the BAO peaks show that α is well constrained around 1.0, regardless of σ0, with precision between 1% and 3% across redshift bins. In contrast, α measurements are more sensitive to increases in σ0. For σ0 = 0.003, the results remain close to the fiducial value, with uncertainties ranging between 4% and 9%; for σ0 = 0.006, significant deviations from the fiducial value are observed. We also study the ability to measure parameters (Ωm, H0rd) using distance measurements, proving robust constraints as a cosmological probe under CSST-like redshift uncertainties. These findings demonstrate that the CSST survey enables few-percent precision measurements of DA using the wedge 2PCF method, highlighting its potential to place tight constraints on the universe’s expansion history and contribute to high-precision cosmological studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4047
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, an academic journal cosponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and published by Science China Press, is committed to publishing high-quality, original results in both basic and applied research. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, is published in both print and electronic forms. It is indexed by Science Citation Index. Categories of articles: Reviews summarize representative results and achievements in a particular topic or an area, comment on the current state of research, and advise on the research directions. The author’s own opinion and related discussion is requested. Research papers report on important original results in all areas of physics, mechanics and astronomy. Brief reports present short reports in a timely manner of the latest important results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信