Tsz-Yui Chan , Chien-Yu Lin , Shen-Hao Lee , Jiunn-Woei Liaw , Tsi-Chian Chao , I-Chun Cho
{"title":"Optimizing minibeam collimator design for enhancing normal tissue sparing in ocular tumour proton therapy","authors":"Tsz-Yui Chan , Chien-Yu Lin , Shen-Hao Lee , Jiunn-Woei Liaw , Tsi-Chian Chao , I-Chun Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uveal melanoma, the most common primary intraocular tumour in adults, presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and the potential for severe treatment-related complications, including vision loss. Achieving effective tumour control while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues remains a critical goal in radiotherapy. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT), an advanced form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges.</div><div>pMBRT employs a mechanical collimator to spatially fractionate a broad proton beam into multiple narrow beamlets, creating a dose distribution with high-dose peaks and low-dose valleys in shallow regions. As the beamlets travel deeper into tissue, multiple Coulomb scattering facilitates their convergence, resulting in a uniform dose at the tumour target.</div><div>This study systematically optimized the collimator design by evaluating various geometries and materials, specifically brass and polylactic acid (PLA). Simulations of dose distributions were performed using the Tool for Particle Simulation (TOPAS) and validated through experimental measurements with Gafchromic films. Results indicated that brass collimators, with their high atomic number, produced sharper dose profiles and higher peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR), demonstrating superior spatial dose modulation. Conversely, PLA collimators yielded smoother dose profiles and lower secondary dose contributions, showcasing their potential for reducing collateral tissue damage.</div><div>The optimized collimator design, featuring a 0.8 mm slit width and a 1 mm spacing, achieved an ideal balance between maximizing PVDR and ensuring uniform beam recombination at the target depth. These findings underscore the potential of tailored collimator designs to enhance the therapeutic precision of pMBRT, offering improved tumour control with minimized impact on healthy tissues. This study provides a foundation for further advancements in collimator technology and its clinical applications in treating uveal melanoma and other challenging tumour sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25001665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uveal melanoma, the most common primary intraocular tumour in adults, presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and the potential for severe treatment-related complications, including vision loss. Achieving effective tumour control while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues remains a critical goal in radiotherapy. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT), an advanced form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges.
pMBRT employs a mechanical collimator to spatially fractionate a broad proton beam into multiple narrow beamlets, creating a dose distribution with high-dose peaks and low-dose valleys in shallow regions. As the beamlets travel deeper into tissue, multiple Coulomb scattering facilitates their convergence, resulting in a uniform dose at the tumour target.
This study systematically optimized the collimator design by evaluating various geometries and materials, specifically brass and polylactic acid (PLA). Simulations of dose distributions were performed using the Tool for Particle Simulation (TOPAS) and validated through experimental measurements with Gafchromic films. Results indicated that brass collimators, with their high atomic number, produced sharper dose profiles and higher peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR), demonstrating superior spatial dose modulation. Conversely, PLA collimators yielded smoother dose profiles and lower secondary dose contributions, showcasing their potential for reducing collateral tissue damage.
The optimized collimator design, featuring a 0.8 mm slit width and a 1 mm spacing, achieved an ideal balance between maximizing PVDR and ensuring uniform beam recombination at the target depth. These findings underscore the potential of tailored collimator designs to enhance the therapeutic precision of pMBRT, offering improved tumour control with minimized impact on healthy tissues. This study provides a foundation for further advancements in collimator technology and its clinical applications in treating uveal melanoma and other challenging tumour sites.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.