“Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto”: A qualitative content analysis of AI music in WorldCat

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Adam Eric Berkowitz
{"title":"“Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto”: A qualitative content analysis of AI music in WorldCat","authors":"Adam Eric Berkowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used for experimentation in generating music for the last seventy years, but recent advances in generative AI (genAI) have led to novel, creative, and even surprising results. Issues arise when genAI and human efforts are simultaneously recognized in a creative work, constituting the uncanny valley and leading to discomfort among listeners. Additionally, the lack of transparency required of media producers regarding genAI use robs audiences of their right to choose whether to engage or avoid genAI content. This has sparked discussions among researchers, industry leaders, and lawmakers about regulating genAI use with priority given to enforcing transparency. Libraries can play a role in this by curating metadata when cataloging genAI materials, but current cataloging practices and policies inhibit the cataloger's ability to maximize accuracy and transparency when describing genAI items. This study features a content analysis that examines WorldCat item records belonging to genAI songs and music albums and finds inconsistent item record descriptions, often vaguely referring to or omitting genAI use. Supported by epidata theory, this study recommends adopting Resource Description and Access (RDA) standards to improve accuracy and transparency in cataloging genAI music.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 103026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used for experimentation in generating music for the last seventy years, but recent advances in generative AI (genAI) have led to novel, creative, and even surprising results. Issues arise when genAI and human efforts are simultaneously recognized in a creative work, constituting the uncanny valley and leading to discomfort among listeners. Additionally, the lack of transparency required of media producers regarding genAI use robs audiences of their right to choose whether to engage or avoid genAI content. This has sparked discussions among researchers, industry leaders, and lawmakers about regulating genAI use with priority given to enforcing transparency. Libraries can play a role in this by curating metadata when cataloging genAI materials, but current cataloging practices and policies inhibit the cataloger's ability to maximize accuracy and transparency when describing genAI items. This study features a content analysis that examines WorldCat item records belonging to genAI songs and music albums and finds inconsistent item record descriptions, often vaguely referring to or omitting genAI use. Supported by epidata theory, this study recommends adopting Resource Description and Access (RDA) standards to improve accuracy and transparency in cataloging genAI music.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信