Effect of unpredictability in economic and energy policy on China's emission trading programme pilots' volatility

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mengwen Chen , Lu Chung
{"title":"Effect of unpredictability in economic and energy policy on China's emission trading programme pilots' volatility","authors":"Mengwen Chen ,&nbsp;Lu Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The volatility of China's emission trading system (ETS) pilots is significantly influenced by economic policy uncertainty (EPU). This article examines how EPU affects the volatility of three typical ETS pilots in China—Hubei, Guangdong, and Beijing—using two local and two global EPU indexes as proxies based on the GARCH-MIDAS model. The study reveals notable differences in the impacts on volatility between the ETS pilots and EPU indexes. For instance, a 0.01 unit increase in the weighted growth rate of EPU results in a long-term volatility increase of 9.371%–28.777 % for the Hubei ETS and 1.629%–5.444 % for the Beijing ETS. In contrast, in Guangdong, the volatility rises by 11.926%–22.713 % in response to a rise in local EPU and falls by 38.302%–59.063 % in response to an increase in global EPU. Additionally, economic policy changes impact ETS pilots' production volatility by modifying industry output, although the carbon market's stabilization measures mitigate this impact. The GARCH-MIDAS model with EPU indices demonstrates better out-of-sample prediction ability for the Hubei and Beijing ETS. This research provides investors with a reliable method for portfolio construction and offers significant policy implications for the government to stabilize ETS volatility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101676"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The volatility of China's emission trading system (ETS) pilots is significantly influenced by economic policy uncertainty (EPU). This article examines how EPU affects the volatility of three typical ETS pilots in China—Hubei, Guangdong, and Beijing—using two local and two global EPU indexes as proxies based on the GARCH-MIDAS model. The study reveals notable differences in the impacts on volatility between the ETS pilots and EPU indexes. For instance, a 0.01 unit increase in the weighted growth rate of EPU results in a long-term volatility increase of 9.371%–28.777 % for the Hubei ETS and 1.629%–5.444 % for the Beijing ETS. In contrast, in Guangdong, the volatility rises by 11.926%–22.713 % in response to a rise in local EPU and falls by 38.302%–59.063 % in response to an increase in global EPU. Additionally, economic policy changes impact ETS pilots' production volatility by modifying industry output, although the carbon market's stabilization measures mitigate this impact. The GARCH-MIDAS model with EPU indices demonstrates better out-of-sample prediction ability for the Hubei and Beijing ETS. This research provides investors with a reliable method for portfolio construction and offers significant policy implications for the government to stabilize ETS volatility.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信