Evaluating the impact of EDFA response modeling in the optical network QoT estimation

IF 2.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Allan A.B. Silva , Erick A. Barboza , Felipe C.N.O. Lima , Joaquim F. Martins-Filho , Marcionilo J. Silva
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of EDFA response modeling in the optical network QoT estimation","authors":"Allan A.B. Silva ,&nbsp;Erick A. Barboza ,&nbsp;Felipe C.N.O. Lima ,&nbsp;Joaquim F. Martins-Filho ,&nbsp;Marcionilo J. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.yofte.2025.104177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating the quality of transmission (QoT) in optical networks is a key metric for planning, managing, and optimizing networks. QoT estimation depends on good modeling of the internal components of the optical link to accurately simulate transmission and consequent signal degradation. The amplifier is a source of noise and signal distortion; therefore, amplifier modeling plays a crucial role in QoT estimation. We present an evaluation of the impact of different amplifier models on the estimation of QoT in optical networks. We based our simulation on GNPy, a QoT estimator widely used to simulate and optimize the design of optical networks. Our main contributions are: (1) a new version of the GNPY in which the amplifier can be modeled using a power mask; (2) a benchmark considering the advanced GNPy amplifier model and power mask as estimators considering a numeric simulator and real-world amplifier data; and (3) an analysis of the impacts in the network QoT for each amplifier model. The results show that, considering a single link scenario, the absolute maximum error of the Power Mask Model is 2.85 dB in relation to the benchmark, whereas the Advanced Model presented a maximum error of 4.61 dB. In the network scenario, the result shows that the Advanced Model tends to deliver more optimistic and flat estimates even in cases of high tilt, whereas the Power Mask Model is more sensitive to transmission noise in these cases, estimating lower GSNR and transmission rates, including several cases of connection blocking. The findings of this study may be useful to optical network researchers and operators who want to have more flexible network management and optimization through simulations and software-controlled networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19663,"journal":{"name":"Optical Fiber Technology","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 104177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Fiber Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068520025000525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating the quality of transmission (QoT) in optical networks is a key metric for planning, managing, and optimizing networks. QoT estimation depends on good modeling of the internal components of the optical link to accurately simulate transmission and consequent signal degradation. The amplifier is a source of noise and signal distortion; therefore, amplifier modeling plays a crucial role in QoT estimation. We present an evaluation of the impact of different amplifier models on the estimation of QoT in optical networks. We based our simulation on GNPy, a QoT estimator widely used to simulate and optimize the design of optical networks. Our main contributions are: (1) a new version of the GNPY in which the amplifier can be modeled using a power mask; (2) a benchmark considering the advanced GNPy amplifier model and power mask as estimators considering a numeric simulator and real-world amplifier data; and (3) an analysis of the impacts in the network QoT for each amplifier model. The results show that, considering a single link scenario, the absolute maximum error of the Power Mask Model is 2.85 dB in relation to the benchmark, whereas the Advanced Model presented a maximum error of 4.61 dB. In the network scenario, the result shows that the Advanced Model tends to deliver more optimistic and flat estimates even in cases of high tilt, whereas the Power Mask Model is more sensitive to transmission noise in these cases, estimating lower GSNR and transmission rates, including several cases of connection blocking. The findings of this study may be useful to optical network researchers and operators who want to have more flexible network management and optimization through simulations and software-controlled networks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optical Fiber Technology
Optical Fiber Technology 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
327
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Innovations in optical fiber technology are revolutionizing world communications. Newly developed fiber amplifiers allow for direct transmission of high-speed signals over transcontinental distances without the need for electronic regeneration. Optical fibers find new applications in data processing. The impact of fiber materials, devices, and systems on communications in the coming decades will create an abundance of primary literature and the need for up-to-date reviews. Optical Fiber Technology: Materials, Devices, and Systems is a new cutting-edge journal designed to fill a need in this rapidly evolving field for speedy publication of regular length papers. Both theoretical and experimental papers on fiber materials, devices, and system performance evaluation and measurements are eligible, with emphasis on practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信