The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrew Buckwell , Syezlin Hasan , Alana Knight , Christopher Fleming , Jeremy Harte , James C.R. Smart
{"title":"The social licence of salmon aquaculture in Tasmania: Fulfilling the social bargain","authors":"Andrew Buckwell ,&nbsp;Syezlin Hasan ,&nbsp;Alana Knight ,&nbsp;Christopher Fleming ,&nbsp;Jeremy Harte ,&nbsp;James C.R. Smart","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry’s legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry’s future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this—as part of a social bargain with the community—all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 106653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salmon aquaculture is one of a number of industries in Tasmania that can benefit from new technologies to reduce the local ecological and community amenity impacts of its coastal operations. This may assist the industry in retaining its social licence to operate (SLO), which is currently in question, so that it can continue generating benefits for local livelihoods. We used Q-methodology to gain empirical insight into aquaculture stakeholder perspectives on the role that SLO plays in maintaining the industry’s legitimacy. Results revealed four factors, all of which saw genuine engagement with strategies to retain SLO as being fundamental to the industry’s future. Whilst three factors prioritised the economic and employment benefits of the industry as playing an important role in this—as part of a social bargain with the community—all four factors believed that the continued legitimacy of the industry requires broader civil society consent. One factor considered the industry as being under pressure, but nevertheless felt a SLO could be re-established if the industry followed certain steps to secure it. Our research demonstrates that salmon aquaculture would do well to continue to actively seek SLO, achievement of which will maximise total net social benefit and point to pathways that begin to incorporate the nature-positive and people-positive agendas. It should also consider engagement with both communities of place and communities of practice as it explores opportunities in the blue economy and recognise that disclosure and transparency will assist in demonstrating procedural fairness.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信