Kelly Gingrich , Lina Brand-Correa , Elaine Howarth , Anna Stratton
{"title":"Degrowth in a settler state: climate-just economic transitions and Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada","authors":"Kelly Gingrich , Lina Brand-Correa , Elaine Howarth , Anna Stratton","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Degrowth offers pathways to stay within ecological limits while increasing human and planetary wellbeing. As non-indigenous scholars living in the settler state of Canada we see a gap in the degrowth literature regarding degrowth transitions within settler societies, as much of it comes out of a European context. In this paper, we analyze three political commitments that Canada has signed - the Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC), the Paris Climate Agreement and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,- to explore how a degrowth transition may help us move forward together on the path of Reconciliation with (and decolonization of) First Nations, Metis and Inuit Peoples (Indigenous Peoples). We do this by searching for interconnections between Canada's current obligations towards Reconciliation and three pillars of degrowth thought: ecological limits and Reconciliation with the land; autonomy and Indigenous sovereignty; and alternative views of ‘the good life’. We offer an exploration of these interconnections to open up ways to ground degrowth transitions in reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples. Our aim is to encourage and challenge the ecological economics and degrowth communities to engage with pluralistic and decolonial imaginaries in settler societies specifically.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 108549"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925000321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Degrowth offers pathways to stay within ecological limits while increasing human and planetary wellbeing. As non-indigenous scholars living in the settler state of Canada we see a gap in the degrowth literature regarding degrowth transitions within settler societies, as much of it comes out of a European context. In this paper, we analyze three political commitments that Canada has signed - the Calls to Action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC), the Paris Climate Agreement and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,- to explore how a degrowth transition may help us move forward together on the path of Reconciliation with (and decolonization of) First Nations, Metis and Inuit Peoples (Indigenous Peoples). We do this by searching for interconnections between Canada's current obligations towards Reconciliation and three pillars of degrowth thought: ecological limits and Reconciliation with the land; autonomy and Indigenous sovereignty; and alternative views of ‘the good life’. We offer an exploration of these interconnections to open up ways to ground degrowth transitions in reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples. Our aim is to encourage and challenge the ecological economics and degrowth communities to engage with pluralistic and decolonial imaginaries in settler societies specifically.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.