Evaluation of remote programming of cochlear implants under challenging conditions

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Luis Lassaletta , Miryam Calvino , Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado , Giovanni Danesi , Ilaria Patelli , Michela Zana , Íñigo Ruiz de Erenchun-Lasa , Manuela del Carmen Zapata , Eva María Muñoz Yuste , Daniel Schaudel , Cherisse Mark , Gionata Conni , Pedro Luis Sarría Echegaray , Guillermo til-Pérez , Isaac David Gutiérrez Pérez , Elena Muñoz Pascual
{"title":"Evaluation of remote programming of cochlear implants under challenging conditions","authors":"Luis Lassaletta ,&nbsp;Miryam Calvino ,&nbsp;Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado ,&nbsp;Giovanni Danesi ,&nbsp;Ilaria Patelli ,&nbsp;Michela Zana ,&nbsp;Íñigo Ruiz de Erenchun-Lasa ,&nbsp;Manuela del Carmen Zapata ,&nbsp;Eva María Muñoz Yuste ,&nbsp;Daniel Schaudel ,&nbsp;Cherisse Mark ,&nbsp;Gionata Conni ,&nbsp;Pedro Luis Sarría Echegaray ,&nbsp;Guillermo til-Pérez ,&nbsp;Isaac David Gutiérrez Pérez ,&nbsp;Elena Muñoz Pascual","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>During the strained period of the COVID-19 pandemic, an international multi-centric clinical pilot study of remote cochlear implant fitting (remote programming) took place with the primary aim of evaluating the satisfaction of patients and practitioners with this procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Cochlear implant users and clinical practitioners from clinics in Spain and Italy completed a questionnaire to evaluate their experience regarding their satisfaction with the procedure and with its efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>54 responses were collected from 48 users and 42 responses were collected from 9 clinical practitioners. Practitioners were able to perform both remote fitting and remote telemetry. They rated their satisfaction with the procedure highly, with a median value of 9.5/10. Over 90% were satisfied with the results of the procedure, and all who responded would be willing to use remote programming again. Practitioners also rated the technical performance highly. Users rated their satisfaction with the procedure with a median value of 8/10. The great majority of users would be willing to undergo remote programming again (81.3%), and most would recommend the procedure to other users (74%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Remote programming is a well-received procedure among both clinical practitioners and cochlear implant users, and offers a useful alternative when in-person visits are not practical or not possible, as was the case during the pandemic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"76 2","pages":"Pages 91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651925000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

During the strained period of the COVID-19 pandemic, an international multi-centric clinical pilot study of remote cochlear implant fitting (remote programming) took place with the primary aim of evaluating the satisfaction of patients and practitioners with this procedure.

Materials and methods

Cochlear implant users and clinical practitioners from clinics in Spain and Italy completed a questionnaire to evaluate their experience regarding their satisfaction with the procedure and with its efficacy.

Results

54 responses were collected from 48 users and 42 responses were collected from 9 clinical practitioners. Practitioners were able to perform both remote fitting and remote telemetry. They rated their satisfaction with the procedure highly, with a median value of 9.5/10. Over 90% were satisfied with the results of the procedure, and all who responded would be willing to use remote programming again. Practitioners also rated the technical performance highly. Users rated their satisfaction with the procedure with a median value of 8/10. The great majority of users would be willing to undergo remote programming again (81.3%), and most would recommend the procedure to other users (74%).

Conclusions

Remote programming is a well-received procedure among both clinical practitioners and cochlear implant users, and offers a useful alternative when in-person visits are not practical or not possible, as was the case during the pandemic.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信