Resilience of food supply systems to sudden shocks: A global review and narrative synthesis

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Iona Y. Huang , Oscar A. Forero , Erika V. Wagner-Medina , Hernando Florez Diaz , Ourania Tremma , Xavier Fargetton , James Lowenberg-DeBoer
{"title":"Resilience of food supply systems to sudden shocks: A global review and narrative synthesis","authors":"Iona Y. Huang ,&nbsp;Oscar A. Forero ,&nbsp;Erika V. Wagner-Medina ,&nbsp;Hernando Florez Diaz ,&nbsp;Ourania Tremma ,&nbsp;Xavier Fargetton ,&nbsp;James Lowenberg-DeBoer","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global food supply systems (FSS) are increasingly tested by sudden shocks such as pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and extreme weather events, that demand adaptive and transformative responses. This systematic review analyses 26 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2023, each examining an abrupt disruption in FSS. Of these, 22 focus on exposure to COVID-19 and four on natural disasters. Findings reveal that the most resilient food supply systems are those that combine strong operational, relational, and structural attributes with well-developed capacities at each shock phase (pre-, during-, and post-). These elements, taken together, not only enable effective recovery (returning to near-normal function) but also foster adaptation (dynamic adjustments to new conditions) and transformational shifts (permanent, beneficial reconfigurations) whenever disruptive events strike. However, many studies indicate that the capacity to “bounce forward” remains limited: short-term coping actions are often not converted into long-term structural reforms. This gap is particularly noticeable in settings with weak policy frameworks or resource constraints, undermining broader resilience gains. Although FSS often exhibit significant adaptability during disruptions, deeper transformation requires sustained efforts and alignment among governmental, private-sector, and community actors. The integrated framework of resilience proposed in this review clarifies how attributes underpin capacities that, when activated through concrete actions, shape resilience outcomes. By emphasising both short-term coping and long-term systemic change, stakeholders can strengthen future resilience strategies across diverse FSS contexts. Enhanced conceptual clarity, multi-scalar approaches, and expanded empirical evidence are crucial for guiding policy and practice, ultimately enabling FSS to withstand and learn from sudden shocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100842"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912425000173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global food supply systems (FSS) are increasingly tested by sudden shocks such as pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and extreme weather events, that demand adaptive and transformative responses. This systematic review analyses 26 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2023, each examining an abrupt disruption in FSS. Of these, 22 focus on exposure to COVID-19 and four on natural disasters. Findings reveal that the most resilient food supply systems are those that combine strong operational, relational, and structural attributes with well-developed capacities at each shock phase (pre-, during-, and post-). These elements, taken together, not only enable effective recovery (returning to near-normal function) but also foster adaptation (dynamic adjustments to new conditions) and transformational shifts (permanent, beneficial reconfigurations) whenever disruptive events strike. However, many studies indicate that the capacity to “bounce forward” remains limited: short-term coping actions are often not converted into long-term structural reforms. This gap is particularly noticeable in settings with weak policy frameworks or resource constraints, undermining broader resilience gains. Although FSS often exhibit significant adaptability during disruptions, deeper transformation requires sustained efforts and alignment among governmental, private-sector, and community actors. The integrated framework of resilience proposed in this review clarifies how attributes underpin capacities that, when activated through concrete actions, shape resilience outcomes. By emphasising both short-term coping and long-term systemic change, stakeholders can strengthen future resilience strategies across diverse FSS contexts. Enhanced conceptual clarity, multi-scalar approaches, and expanded empirical evidence are crucial for guiding policy and practice, ultimately enabling FSS to withstand and learn from sudden shocks.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信