Influence of coal rank, ash, mineral content, and maceral composition on CO2 adsorption in South African coals

Kasturie Premlall, Lawrence Koech
{"title":"Influence of coal rank, ash, mineral content, and maceral composition on CO2 adsorption in South African coals","authors":"Kasturie Premlall,&nbsp;Lawrence Koech","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the influence of coal rank, ash content, mineral matter, and maceral composition on the CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity of ten distinct South African coal samples. A high-pressure volumetric adsorption system (HPVAS) was utilized to assess CO<sub>2</sub> sorption characteristics under supercritical conditions at 35 °C and pressures up to 85 bar. Comprehensive characterization, including proximate and ultimate analysis, petrographic analysis, and density determination, was conducted to understand how these factors influence CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption. The findings reveal that higher-rank coals (HRC), particularly those with vitrinite reflectance above 1.2%, demonstrated superior CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities, reaching up to 2.17 mmol/g. Medium-rank coals (MRC) with higher inertinite content showed lower adsorption capacities, with the lowest recorded at 0.78 mmol/g, except for the IN coal sample. CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption increased with vitrinite reflectance, particularly within the 0.51% to 0.81% range for medium-rank coals. Linear increase in CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity was noted as carbon content increased from MRC towards HRC particularly in SM and AN coals. An increase in volatile matter content corresponded with a significant decline in CO<sub>2</sub> sorption capacity. Additionally, a negative correlation between ash content, mineral matter, liptinite, inertinite, and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity was evident, likely due to pore obstruction and reduced surface area. Liptinite-rich coals, such as BL, GN, EM, and WG, exhibited decreased adsorption capacity, with BL showing the highest liptinite content at 5.5%. The analysis indicates that while ash content influences sorption capacity, the organic matter, especially vitrinite, serve as the primary sites for gas adsorption. The findings of this study will enhance understanding of the CO₂ adsorption behaviour of South African coals supporting the funding from highly intensive CO₂ emitting industries to enable further research of carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot projects tailored to regional coal properties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782325000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of coal rank, ash content, mineral matter, and maceral composition on the CO2 adsorption capacity of ten distinct South African coal samples. A high-pressure volumetric adsorption system (HPVAS) was utilized to assess CO2 sorption characteristics under supercritical conditions at 35 °C and pressures up to 85 bar. Comprehensive characterization, including proximate and ultimate analysis, petrographic analysis, and density determination, was conducted to understand how these factors influence CO2 adsorption. The findings reveal that higher-rank coals (HRC), particularly those with vitrinite reflectance above 1.2%, demonstrated superior CO2 adsorption capacities, reaching up to 2.17 mmol/g. Medium-rank coals (MRC) with higher inertinite content showed lower adsorption capacities, with the lowest recorded at 0.78 mmol/g, except for the IN coal sample. CO2 adsorption increased with vitrinite reflectance, particularly within the 0.51% to 0.81% range for medium-rank coals. Linear increase in CO2 adsorption capacity was noted as carbon content increased from MRC towards HRC particularly in SM and AN coals. An increase in volatile matter content corresponded with a significant decline in CO2 sorption capacity. Additionally, a negative correlation between ash content, mineral matter, liptinite, inertinite, and CO2 adsorption capacity was evident, likely due to pore obstruction and reduced surface area. Liptinite-rich coals, such as BL, GN, EM, and WG, exhibited decreased adsorption capacity, with BL showing the highest liptinite content at 5.5%. The analysis indicates that while ash content influences sorption capacity, the organic matter, especially vitrinite, serve as the primary sites for gas adsorption. The findings of this study will enhance understanding of the CO₂ adsorption behaviour of South African coals supporting the funding from highly intensive CO₂ emitting industries to enable further research of carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilot projects tailored to regional coal properties.
煤阶、灰分、矿物含量和矿物组成对南非煤中CO2吸附的影响
本研究考察了煤阶、灰分含量、矿物成分和矿物组成对10种不同南非煤样品CO2吸附能力的影响。利用高压体积吸附系统(HPVAS)在35°C和85 bar的超临界条件下评估CO2的吸附特性。为了了解这些因素对CO2吸附的影响,进行了全面的表征,包括近似和最终分析、岩石学分析和密度测定。结果表明,高阶煤(HRC),特别是镜质组反射率在1.2%以上的煤,具有较好的CO2吸附能力,吸附量可达2.17 mmol/g。惰性煤含量较高的中阶煤(MRC)吸附量较低,除IN煤样品外,最低吸附量为0.78 mmol/g。CO2吸附随镜质组反射率的增加而增加,中煤在0.51% ~ 0.81%范围内表现得尤为明显。随着碳含量从MRC向HRC的增加,特别是SM和AN煤的CO2吸附量呈线性增加。挥发物含量的增加与CO2吸附能力的显著下降相对应。此外,灰分、矿物、脂质、惰质与CO2吸附能力呈明显的负相关,这可能是由于孔隙阻塞和表面积减小所致。富脂质煤BL、GN、EM和WG的吸附能力下降,其中BL的脂质含量最高,为5.5%。分析表明,灰分含量影响吸附能力,有机质,尤其是镜质组是气体吸附的主要场所。这项研究的结果将加强对南非煤炭CO 2吸附行为的理解,支持高强度CO 2排放工业的资金,以进一步研究适合区域煤炭特性的碳捕集与封存(CCS)试点项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信