Rundong Feng , Bin Chen , Shenghe Liu , Fuyuan Wang , Kaiyong Wang , Rouyu Zhengchen , Disheng Wang
{"title":"Future inequality of human exposure to greenspace resource and spatial utilization strategy in China","authors":"Rundong Feng , Bin Chen , Shenghe Liu , Fuyuan Wang , Kaiyong Wang , Rouyu Zhengchen , Disheng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inequity in human exposure to greenspaces is a global concern, but predicting future long-term trends and designing spatial utilization strategy are still lacking. This study integrated multi-source data, future land use simulation model and machine learning to estimate the spatiotemporal patterns of greenspace exposure and its inequality (measured by Gini index) in China from 2020 to 2100, and proposed spatial utilization strategy assuming constant greenspace provision. Results showed that future greenspace exposure inequality and change rates are generally higher (1.1–2.7 times) in northern China than in southern China. Under the SSP3–7.0 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios, greenspace exposure inequality is more pronounced and grows faster for older and less educated women, as well as in megacities. Moreover, a targeted reduction in patch fragmentation can alleviate greenspace exposure inequality by 8.1–19.9 %. These insights require future urban greening to simultaneously consider greenspace spatial configuration and structural differences to popularize greenspaces for urban residents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108231"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inequity in human exposure to greenspaces is a global concern, but predicting future long-term trends and designing spatial utilization strategy are still lacking. This study integrated multi-source data, future land use simulation model and machine learning to estimate the spatiotemporal patterns of greenspace exposure and its inequality (measured by Gini index) in China from 2020 to 2100, and proposed spatial utilization strategy assuming constant greenspace provision. Results showed that future greenspace exposure inequality and change rates are generally higher (1.1–2.7 times) in northern China than in southern China. Under the SSP3–7.0 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios, greenspace exposure inequality is more pronounced and grows faster for older and less educated women, as well as in megacities. Moreover, a targeted reduction in patch fragmentation can alleviate greenspace exposure inequality by 8.1–19.9 %. These insights require future urban greening to simultaneously consider greenspace spatial configuration and structural differences to popularize greenspaces for urban residents.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.