Establishment of a Standard Technique for Determining Laser Flare Photometry Values during Assessment of Intraocular Inflammation

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Edmund Tsui MD, MS , Nicholas J. Jackson PhD, MPH , Judy L. Chen MD , Gary N. Holland MD
{"title":"Establishment of a Standard Technique for Determining Laser Flare Photometry Values during Assessment of Intraocular Inflammation","authors":"Edmund Tsui MD, MS ,&nbsp;Nicholas J. Jackson PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Judy L. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Gary N. Holland MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purposes of this study were to determine whether 2 laser flare photometry (LFP) devices produce similar results using various statistical techniques for determining a single, final LFP value for anterior chamber protein level; to determine whether a traditional technique adequately addresses outlier measurements; and to identify a simpler technique that produces LFP values similar to the traditional technique.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients at a tertiary referral center who have histories of uveitis in 1 or both eyes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven LFP measurements were obtained on 200 eyes (100 patients) using Kowa FM-500 and FM-700 laser flare photometers (Kowa Company, Ltd). For each device, the final LFP values were determined using 4 statistical outlier removal techniques on all measurements and by means and medians for all 7 and for the first 5 measurements. The final LFP values by each technique were compared between the devices. Using the FM-700, host- and disease-related factors (age, sex, laterality, uveitis history, uveitis activity, and LFP values) were evaluated for their effects on outliers. Laser flare photometry values by each technique were compared with the LFP value by the traditional technique. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare values.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Laser flare photometry values by various techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean age of participants was 49.5 ± 19.1 years; 72% were female. Final LFP values did not vary meaningfully between the 2 devices for any technique (all ICCs: 0.81). With 5 measurements, no subgroup factors influenced the presence of outliers, and no final LFP values varied meaningfully from the final LFP value determined by the traditional technique (ICC: 0.97–1.00).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The automated mean provided by the FM-700 device based on 5 consecutive measurements may be a suitable final LFP value for use in patient care and clinical research.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524002264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to determine whether 2 laser flare photometry (LFP) devices produce similar results using various statistical techniques for determining a single, final LFP value for anterior chamber protein level; to determine whether a traditional technique adequately addresses outlier measurements; and to identify a simpler technique that produces LFP values similar to the traditional technique.

Design

Prospective cross-sectional study.

Participants

Patients at a tertiary referral center who have histories of uveitis in 1 or both eyes.

Methods

Seven LFP measurements were obtained on 200 eyes (100 patients) using Kowa FM-500 and FM-700 laser flare photometers (Kowa Company, Ltd). For each device, the final LFP values were determined using 4 statistical outlier removal techniques on all measurements and by means and medians for all 7 and for the first 5 measurements. The final LFP values by each technique were compared between the devices. Using the FM-700, host- and disease-related factors (age, sex, laterality, uveitis history, uveitis activity, and LFP values) were evaluated for their effects on outliers. Laser flare photometry values by each technique were compared with the LFP value by the traditional technique. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare values.

Main Outcome Measures

Laser flare photometry values by various techniques.

Results

The mean age of participants was 49.5 ± 19.1 years; 72% were female. Final LFP values did not vary meaningfully between the 2 devices for any technique (all ICCs: 0.81). With 5 measurements, no subgroup factors influenced the presence of outliers, and no final LFP values varied meaningfully from the final LFP value determined by the traditional technique (ICC: 0.97–1.00).

Conclusions

The automated mean provided by the FM-700 device based on 5 consecutive measurements may be a suitable final LFP value for use in patient care and clinical research.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信