AlphaMissense Predictions and ClinVar Annotations: A Deep Learning Approach to Uveal Melanoma

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
David J. Taylor Gonzalez MD , Mak B. Djulbegovic MD, MSc , Meghan Sharma MD, MPH , Michael Antonietti BS , Colin K. Kim BS , Vladimir N. Uversky PhD, DSc , Carol L. Karp MD , Carol L. Shields MD , Matthew W. Wilson MD
{"title":"AlphaMissense Predictions and ClinVar Annotations: A Deep Learning Approach to Uveal Melanoma","authors":"David J. Taylor Gonzalez MD ,&nbsp;Mak B. Djulbegovic MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Meghan Sharma MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael Antonietti BS ,&nbsp;Colin K. Kim BS ,&nbsp;Vladimir N. Uversky PhD, DSc ,&nbsp;Carol L. Karp MD ,&nbsp;Carol L. Shields MD ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Wilson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Uveal melanoma (UM) poses significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to its variable genetic landscape. We explore the use of a novel deep learning tool to assess the functional impact of genetic mutations in UM.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional bioinformatics exploratory data analysis of genetic mutations from UM cases.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Genetic data from patients diagnosed with UM were analyzed, explicitly focusing on missense mutations sourced from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified missense mutations frequently observed in UM using the COSMIC database, assessed their potential pathogenicity using AlphaMissense, and visualized mutations using AlphaFold. Clinical significance was cross-validated with entries in the ClinVar database.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary outcomes measured were the agreement rates between AlphaMissense predictions and ClinVar annotations regarding the pathogenicity of mutations in critical genes associated with UM, such as <em>GNAQ, GNA11, SF3B1, EIF1AX</em>, and <em>BAP1</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Missense substitutions comprised 91.35% (n = 1310) of mutations in UM found on COSMIC. Of the 151 unique missense mutations analyzed in the most frequently mutated genes, only 40.4% (n = 61) had corresponding data in ClinVar. Notably, AlphaMissense provided definitive classifications for 27.2% (n = 41) of the mutations, which were labeled as “unknown significance” in ClinVar, underscoring its potential to offer more clarity in ambiguous cases. When excluding these mutations of uncertain significance, AlphaMissense showed perfect agreement (100%) with ClinVar across all analyzed genes, demonstrating no discrepancies where a mutation predicted as “pathogenic” was classified as “benign” or vice versa.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Integrating deep learning through AlphaMissense offers a promising approach to understanding the mutational landscape of UM. Our methodology holds the potential to improve genomic diagnostics and inform the development of personalized treatment strategies for UM.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524002094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Uveal melanoma (UM) poses significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to its variable genetic landscape. We explore the use of a novel deep learning tool to assess the functional impact of genetic mutations in UM.

Design

A cross-sectional bioinformatics exploratory data analysis of genetic mutations from UM cases.

Subjects

Genetic data from patients diagnosed with UM were analyzed, explicitly focusing on missense mutations sourced from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database.

Methods

We identified missense mutations frequently observed in UM using the COSMIC database, assessed their potential pathogenicity using AlphaMissense, and visualized mutations using AlphaFold. Clinical significance was cross-validated with entries in the ClinVar database.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcomes measured were the agreement rates between AlphaMissense predictions and ClinVar annotations regarding the pathogenicity of mutations in critical genes associated with UM, such as GNAQ, GNA11, SF3B1, EIF1AX, and BAP1.

Results

Missense substitutions comprised 91.35% (n = 1310) of mutations in UM found on COSMIC. Of the 151 unique missense mutations analyzed in the most frequently mutated genes, only 40.4% (n = 61) had corresponding data in ClinVar. Notably, AlphaMissense provided definitive classifications for 27.2% (n = 41) of the mutations, which were labeled as “unknown significance” in ClinVar, underscoring its potential to offer more clarity in ambiguous cases. When excluding these mutations of uncertain significance, AlphaMissense showed perfect agreement (100%) with ClinVar across all analyzed genes, demonstrating no discrepancies where a mutation predicted as “pathogenic” was classified as “benign” or vice versa.

Conclusions

Integrating deep learning through AlphaMissense offers a promising approach to understanding the mutational landscape of UM. Our methodology holds the potential to improve genomic diagnostics and inform the development of personalized treatment strategies for UM.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
AlphaMissense预测和ClinVar注释:葡萄膜黑色素瘤的深度学习方法
目的葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)由于其多变的遗传环境,对其诊断和预后提出了重大挑战。我们探索使用一种新的深度学习工具来评估UM基因突变的功能影响。设计横断面生物信息学探索性数据分析从UM病例的基因突变。对诊断为UM的患者的遗传数据进行分析,明确关注来自癌症体细胞突变目录(COSMIC)数据库的错义突变。方法使用COSMIC数据库鉴定UM中常见的错义突变,使用AlphaMissense评估其潜在致病性,并使用AlphaFold可视化突变。临床意义与ClinVar数据库中的条目进行交叉验证。主要结果测量主要结果测量的是关于与UM相关的关键基因(如GNAQ、GNA11、SF3B1、EIF1AX和BAP1)突变的致病性,AlphaMissense预测和ClinVar注释之间的一致性。结果在COSMIC上发现的UM突变中,错义置换占91.35% (n = 1310)。在最常突变基因中分析的151个独特错义突变中,只有40.4% (n = 61)在ClinVar中有相应的数据。值得注意的是,AlphaMissense为27.2% (n = 41)的突变提供了明确的分类,这些突变在ClinVar中被标记为“未知意义”,强调了它在模棱两可的病例中提供更清晰的可能性。当排除这些不确定意义的突变时,在所有分析的基因中,AlphaMissense与ClinVar表现出完全一致(100%),表明在预测为“致病”的突变被归类为“良性”或反之亦然的情况下,没有差异。通过AlphaMissense整合深度学习为理解UM的突变景观提供了一种很有前途的方法。我们的方法具有改善基因组诊断的潜力,并为UM的个性化治疗策略的发展提供信息。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信