Comprehensive comfort assessment method for the weight of environmental factors by analogical reasoning: A study on the comfort of the tunnel construction environment

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Fang Ruan, Shun Li, Pengxu Chen, Changjin Li
{"title":"Comprehensive comfort assessment method for the weight of environmental factors by analogical reasoning: A study on the comfort of the tunnel construction environment","authors":"Fang Ruan,&nbsp;Shun Li,&nbsp;Pengxu Chen,&nbsp;Changjin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the tunneling process, the numerous and dense electromechanical equipment and shield machine facilities will release a significant amount of heat and noise, and emit various harmful gases and dust, severely influencing the comfort of the construction environment. In this case, it is highly necessary to study the comfort of the tunnel construction environment. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment method for the comfort of the construction environment in the tunnel by analogical reasoning based on standard specifications and known similar situations. The index formula and evaluation grade of four environmental factors in the tunnel construction environment were first proposed according to relevant standard specifications at home and abroad, and the new entropy grey correlation analysis (EGCA) weighting method is used to calculate the objective weight scheme by analogical reasoning. Then, 486 valid questionnaires were collected by network questionnaire, and the subjective weight scheme was obtained through expert evaluation in the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The combined weight scheme was finally obtained based on the results of game theory combining the EGCA and FAHP methods. The rationality and correctness of the method are verified by data. Furthermore, this study compared the weight schemes of other studies, and the results show that tunnel construction workers have higher requirements for thermal and air environments than workers in public buildings. This method can help designers and users estimate and evaluate comfort through standard specifications and known similar situations on occasions where actual data are difficult to obtain. With the improvement of data, the research results can be gradually adjusted and optimized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 106528"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088677982500166X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the tunneling process, the numerous and dense electromechanical equipment and shield machine facilities will release a significant amount of heat and noise, and emit various harmful gases and dust, severely influencing the comfort of the construction environment. In this case, it is highly necessary to study the comfort of the tunnel construction environment. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment method for the comfort of the construction environment in the tunnel by analogical reasoning based on standard specifications and known similar situations. The index formula and evaluation grade of four environmental factors in the tunnel construction environment were first proposed according to relevant standard specifications at home and abroad, and the new entropy grey correlation analysis (EGCA) weighting method is used to calculate the objective weight scheme by analogical reasoning. Then, 486 valid questionnaires were collected by network questionnaire, and the subjective weight scheme was obtained through expert evaluation in the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The combined weight scheme was finally obtained based on the results of game theory combining the EGCA and FAHP methods. The rationality and correctness of the method are verified by data. Furthermore, this study compared the weight schemes of other studies, and the results show that tunnel construction workers have higher requirements for thermal and air environments than workers in public buildings. This method can help designers and users estimate and evaluate comfort through standard specifications and known similar situations on occasions where actual data are difficult to obtain. With the improvement of data, the research results can be gradually adjusted and optimized.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信