Chemicals of emerging concern in wastewater treatment plants from Mendoza: Environmental study in a semiarid region of Argentina

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kathryn Proctor , Jorgelina Altamirano , Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
{"title":"Chemicals of emerging concern in wastewater treatment plants from Mendoza: Environmental study in a semiarid region of Argentina","authors":"Kathryn Proctor ,&nbsp;Jorgelina Altamirano ,&nbsp;Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>WBE aims to quantify community exposure, discover exposure-outcome associations, and trigger policy and technological or societal intervention strategies to promote exposure prevention and public health. This paper aimed to apply a WBE framework to identify a wide range of chemicals of emerging concern (CEC) in two wastewater secondary treatment plants from Mendoza, Argentina, which treated sewage is used for crop irrigation in a semiarid region. Thus, WBE plays a fundamental role in water reuse in a semiarid region stressed by water demand and scarcity. This is the first report of an extensive group of CEC in the liquid- and solid particulate matter (SPM)-phase of inlet and outlet samples of WWTP of Argentina. It aimed to estimate capita usage and the removal efficiency of the studied WWTPs. This is also a unique testing site for the treatment process – an biologically activated open sky serial lagoons vs heavily engineered activated sludge treatment process. Of the 138 CECs targeted in this study, 74 were detected in liquid-phase wastewater influent. Among the most prevalent CEC groups were analgesics/metabolites, and antidepressants/metabolites. Out of the 96 compounds analysable in suspended particulate matter (SPM), 36 were detected. SPM accounted for approximately 2 % at WWTP-A and 6 % at WWTP-B of the total analysed CEC load with SPM enriched with antibiotics and UV filers. Population normalised loads showed little inter-day variation for most of the CECs between the two WWTPs indicating community-driven usage of CECs. Lagoon-based wastewater treatment process utilised in the study sites showed variable removal efficiency with &gt;80 % parabens removal but suboptimal (&lt;50 %) removal of benzophenones and bisphenol A. Antibiotics showed variable removal rates with trimethoprim, triclosan, metronidazole, ofloxacin exceeding 60 %, while little or no removal (&lt;60 %) was observed for clarithromycin, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. Most cardiovascular drugs, antihistamines, and antiepileptics were poorly removed (&lt;50 %) while antidepressants, NSAiDs/analgesics showed much higher removal rates (&gt;60 %). Variable, but high, removal rates were observed for illicit drugs, e.g. with cocaine removal &gt;70 % vs benzoylecgonine's removal &lt;30 % as benzoylecgonine is cocaine's transformation by-product. Comparison of per capita usage of CECs in Argentina and the UK showed that cities tested in the two countries had comparable per capita usage of many pharmaceuticals with differences observed for antidepressants (much higher usage of venlafaxine in Argentina), cardiovascular drugs (much higher usage of valsartan in Argentina), exposure to bisphenol A (higher in the UK) and illicit drugs usage (with higher cocaine use in Argentina vs MDMA in the UK).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100662"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WBE aims to quantify community exposure, discover exposure-outcome associations, and trigger policy and technological or societal intervention strategies to promote exposure prevention and public health. This paper aimed to apply a WBE framework to identify a wide range of chemicals of emerging concern (CEC) in two wastewater secondary treatment plants from Mendoza, Argentina, which treated sewage is used for crop irrigation in a semiarid region. Thus, WBE plays a fundamental role in water reuse in a semiarid region stressed by water demand and scarcity. This is the first report of an extensive group of CEC in the liquid- and solid particulate matter (SPM)-phase of inlet and outlet samples of WWTP of Argentina. It aimed to estimate capita usage and the removal efficiency of the studied WWTPs. This is also a unique testing site for the treatment process – an biologically activated open sky serial lagoons vs heavily engineered activated sludge treatment process. Of the 138 CECs targeted in this study, 74 were detected in liquid-phase wastewater influent. Among the most prevalent CEC groups were analgesics/metabolites, and antidepressants/metabolites. Out of the 96 compounds analysable in suspended particulate matter (SPM), 36 were detected. SPM accounted for approximately 2 % at WWTP-A and 6 % at WWTP-B of the total analysed CEC load with SPM enriched with antibiotics and UV filers. Population normalised loads showed little inter-day variation for most of the CECs between the two WWTPs indicating community-driven usage of CECs. Lagoon-based wastewater treatment process utilised in the study sites showed variable removal efficiency with >80 % parabens removal but suboptimal (<50 %) removal of benzophenones and bisphenol A. Antibiotics showed variable removal rates with trimethoprim, triclosan, metronidazole, ofloxacin exceeding 60 %, while little or no removal (<60 %) was observed for clarithromycin, sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. Most cardiovascular drugs, antihistamines, and antiepileptics were poorly removed (<50 %) while antidepressants, NSAiDs/analgesics showed much higher removal rates (>60 %). Variable, but high, removal rates were observed for illicit drugs, e.g. with cocaine removal >70 % vs benzoylecgonine's removal <30 % as benzoylecgonine is cocaine's transformation by-product. Comparison of per capita usage of CECs in Argentina and the UK showed that cities tested in the two countries had comparable per capita usage of many pharmaceuticals with differences observed for antidepressants (much higher usage of venlafaxine in Argentina), cardiovascular drugs (much higher usage of valsartan in Argentina), exposure to bisphenol A (higher in the UK) and illicit drugs usage (with higher cocaine use in Argentina vs MDMA in the UK).

Abstract Image

来自门多萨的污水处理厂中出现的化学品:阿根廷半干旱地区的环境研究
WBE旨在量化社区暴露,发现暴露与结果的关联,并触发政策和技术或社会干预策略,以促进暴露预防和公共卫生。本文旨在应用WBE框架来确定阿根廷门多萨两个污水二级处理厂中出现的各种新关注化学物质(CEC),这两个处理厂处理的污水用于半干旱地区的作物灌溉。因此,WBE在水需求和稀缺的半干旱地区的水再利用中起着重要作用。这是阿根廷污水处理厂进出口样品的液体和固体颗粒物质(SPM)相中广泛的CEC组的第一次报告。其目的是估计所研究的污水处理厂的人均使用量和去除效率。这也是处理过程的一个独特的试验场-生物激活的开放式天空系列泻湖与重度工程活性污泥处理过程。在本研究的138个CECs中,有74个在液相废水中检测到。最常见的CEC组是镇痛药/代谢物和抗抑郁药/代谢物。在悬浮颗粒物(SPM)中可分析的96种化合物中,检测到36种。在WWTP-A和WWTP-B中,SPM约占总CEC负荷的2%和6%,其中SPM富含抗生素和紫外线过滤器。在两个污水处理厂之间,大多数CECs的种群归一化负荷显示出很小的日间变化,这表明社区驱动的CECs使用。研究地点采用的泻湖废水处理工艺的去除率不同,对羟基苯甲酸酯的去除率为80%,二苯甲酮和双酚a的去除率为50%。抗生素的去除率不同,甲氧苄啶、三氯生、甲硝唑、氧氟沙星的去除率超过60%,而克拉霉素、磺胺甲新唑和四环素的去除率很少或没有(去除率为60%)。大多数心血管药物、抗组胺药和抗癫痫药的去除率较差(50%),而抗抑郁药、非甾体抗炎药/镇痛药的去除率要高得多(60%)。非法药物的去除率虽然不同,但很高,例如可卡因去除率为70%,而苯甲酰lecgonine去除率为30%,因为苯甲酰lecgonine是可卡因的转化副产物。阿根廷和英国对CECs人均使用量的比较表明,在两国接受测试的城市中,许多药物的人均使用量具有可比性,但在抗抑郁药(阿根廷文拉法辛使用量高得多)、心血管药物(阿根廷缬沙坦使用量高得多)、双酚A暴露(英国较高)和非法药物使用(阿根廷可卡因使用量高于英国摇头丸使用量)方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信