M. Adya F. Dilmy MD , Jenica X. Budiman BMedSci , Yudianto B. Saroyo PhD , Amanda Rumondang MD , Yuditiya Purwosunu PhD
{"title":"A low-middle income country experience: conventional hysterectomy vs conservative placenta accreta spectrum management","authors":"M. Adya F. Dilmy MD , Jenica X. Budiman BMedSci , Yudianto B. Saroyo PhD , Amanda Rumondang MD , Yuditiya Purwosunu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><div>Placenta accreta spectrum is one of the most dangerous complications of pregnancy, and its incidence has been rising in recent years. The standard management approach is an elective cesarean-hysterectomy, but it presents with its own set of risks and complications. Although conservative management options exist, there is a lack of definitive guidelines and must be considered on a case-by-case basis.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aimed to describe and compare the outcomes (surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, and maternal mortality) of patients with placenta accreta spectrum who were treated with a hysterectomy and those treated with conservative surgery in the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><div>Data from 271 patients with placenta accreta spectrum at the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital that were collected over 3.5 years were taken and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included the patients’ age, reproductive history, placenta accreta index score, gestational age, emergency status, management method, type of hysterectomy, surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, histopathologic data, and maternal mortality. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 29, with statistical significance set at <em>P</em><.05. Mann-Whitney U tests, independent <em>t</em> tests, chi-square tests, and correlation tests were used where appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>There were no significant differences in the demographics and reproductive history between the hysterectomy and conservative surgery groups. There was considerable difference in terms of surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and placenta accreta index score. The hysterectomy group had longer surgeries (median 180 minutes vs 135 minutes; <em>P</em><.01), greater blood volume lost (median 1000 mL vs 700 mL; <em>P</em><.01), and higher placenta accreta index scores (median 6.5 vs 5.5; <em>P</em><.01). The maternal mortality rate of this study was 1.1%, all of whom were patients from the hysterectomy group, but this finding was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>In this study, patients who underwent conservative surgical management for placenta accreta spectrum experienced shorter surgeries with less bleeding and no maternal death. These patients typically had lower placenta accreta index scores, which may have influenced the choice of management methods and affected surgical outcomes. Although conservative surgery is a viable option, patients and surgeons must carefully weigh the risks and benefits before deciding on a treatment approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Placenta accreta spectrum is one of the most dangerous complications of pregnancy, and its incidence has been rising in recent years. The standard management approach is an elective cesarean-hysterectomy, but it presents with its own set of risks and complications. Although conservative management options exist, there is a lack of definitive guidelines and must be considered on a case-by-case basis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe and compare the outcomes (surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, and maternal mortality) of patients with placenta accreta spectrum who were treated with a hysterectomy and those treated with conservative surgery in the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia.
STUDY DESIGN
Data from 271 patients with placenta accreta spectrum at the Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital that were collected over 3.5 years were taken and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Data collected included the patients’ age, reproductive history, placenta accreta index score, gestational age, emergency status, management method, type of hysterectomy, surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, histopathologic data, and maternal mortality. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 29, with statistical significance set at P<.05. Mann-Whitney U tests, independent t tests, chi-square tests, and correlation tests were used where appropriate.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the demographics and reproductive history between the hysterectomy and conservative surgery groups. There was considerable difference in terms of surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and placenta accreta index score. The hysterectomy group had longer surgeries (median 180 minutes vs 135 minutes; P<.01), greater blood volume lost (median 1000 mL vs 700 mL; P<.01), and higher placenta accreta index scores (median 6.5 vs 5.5; P<.01). The maternal mortality rate of this study was 1.1%, all of whom were patients from the hysterectomy group, but this finding was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
In this study, patients who underwent conservative surgical management for placenta accreta spectrum experienced shorter surgeries with less bleeding and no maternal death. These patients typically had lower placenta accreta index scores, which may have influenced the choice of management methods and affected surgical outcomes. Although conservative surgery is a viable option, patients and surgeons must carefully weigh the risks and benefits before deciding on a treatment approach.
背景:胎盘增生谱是妊娠最危险的并发症之一,近年来其发病率呈上升趋势。标准的治疗方法是选择性剖宫产-子宫切除术,但它有自己的一套风险和并发症。虽然存在保守的管理办法,但缺乏明确的指导方针,必须根据具体情况加以考虑。目的:本研究旨在描述和比较印度尼西亚三级转诊医院Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo总医院子宫切除术和保守手术治疗的胎盘增生患者的结局(手术时间、术中出血量和产妇死亡率)。研究设计:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们收集了来自Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo综合医院超过3.5年的271例胎盘增生性患者的数据并进行了分析。收集的资料包括患者的年龄、生殖史、胎盘增生指数评分、胎龄、急诊情况、处理方法、子宫切除术类型、手术时间、术中出血量、组织病理学资料和产妇死亡率。使用社会科学统计软件包(Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 29)对数据进行分析,统计显著性设置为P<; 0.05。适当时采用Mann-Whitney U检验、独立t检验、卡方检验和相关检验。结果子宫切除术组与保守手术组在人口统计学和生殖史方面无显著差异。两组在手术时间、术中出血量和胎盘增生指数评分方面有相当大的差异。子宫切除术组手术时间更长(中位180分钟vs 135分钟;P< 0.01),更大的失血量(中位1000 mL vs 700 mL;P<.01),胎盘增生指数评分较高(中位数6.5 vs 5.5;术;. 01)。本研究的产妇死亡率为1.1%,均为子宫切除术组的患者,但这一发现无统计学意义。结论在本研究中,因胎盘增生谱而行保守手术治疗的患者手术时间较短,出血较少,无产妇死亡。这些患者通常具有较低的胎盘增生指数评分,这可能影响了治疗方法的选择并影响了手术结果。虽然保守手术是一种可行的选择,但在决定治疗方法之前,患者和外科医生必须仔细权衡风险和收益。
AJOG global reportsEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology