Clinical practice patterns among older multimorbid adults presenting with suspected ischemic symptoms: A multi-center survey

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stephanie Jou , Laura P. Gelfman , Karen P. Alexander , R. Sean Morrison , Deepak L. Bhatt , Alan Moskowitz , Emilia Bagiella , Annetine Gelijns , Gregg W. Stone , David J. Cohen , Leslee J. Shaw , Krishna K. Patel
{"title":"Clinical practice patterns among older multimorbid adults presenting with suspected ischemic symptoms: A multi-center survey","authors":"Stephanie Jou ,&nbsp;Laura P. Gelfman ,&nbsp;Karen P. Alexander ,&nbsp;R. Sean Morrison ,&nbsp;Deepak L. Bhatt ,&nbsp;Alan Moskowitz ,&nbsp;Emilia Bagiella ,&nbsp;Annetine Gelijns ,&nbsp;Gregg W. Stone ,&nbsp;David J. Cohen ,&nbsp;Leslee J. Shaw ,&nbsp;Krishna K. Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>When patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) present with new or worsening ischemic symptoms, initial referral to imaging or optimization of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) with deferral of testing are both acceptable management approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this 12-center study, a 19-item survey exploring preferred management strategy for symptomatic older adults (≥75 years) with or without known CAD, and major patient and clinical factors driving this decision making was administered to clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 96 respondents (70.8 % cardiologists, 20.9 % primary care physicians/geriatricians). Among patients without known CAD, 59 (61.4 %) respondents favored early referral to testing, 6 (6.3 %) opted for initial GDMT and 23 (24.0 %) preferred both. For patients with known CAD, 27 (28.1 %) prioritized initial GDMT optimization, 37 (38.6 %) would refer for early testing and 19.8 % both. Key factors influencing initial preference for GDMT optimization were unoptimized anti-anginal medications, patient preference, increased complication risk, frailty, cognitive impairment and comorbidities. Key factors influencing preference for initial imaging were increasing symptom severity, already optimized GDMT, and electrocardiogram changes. When imaging revealed ischemia, clinicians reported weighing symptom severity, ischemic burden, current medications, comorbidities, frailty, and procedural risks before referring for invasive cardiac angiography.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both initial GDMT optimization and referral for imaging are frequently used approaches for the symptomatic older patient with suspected or known CAD. The survey highlighted the importance of patient characteristics such as frailty, cognitive impairment, multimorbidity and the gap in clinical guidance on how to optimally manage symptomatic older adults with CAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

When patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) present with new or worsening ischemic symptoms, initial referral to imaging or optimization of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) with deferral of testing are both acceptable management approaches.

Methods

In this 12-center study, a 19-item survey exploring preferred management strategy for symptomatic older adults (≥75 years) with or without known CAD, and major patient and clinical factors driving this decision making was administered to clinicians.

Results

There were 96 respondents (70.8 % cardiologists, 20.9 % primary care physicians/geriatricians). Among patients without known CAD, 59 (61.4 %) respondents favored early referral to testing, 6 (6.3 %) opted for initial GDMT and 23 (24.0 %) preferred both. For patients with known CAD, 27 (28.1 %) prioritized initial GDMT optimization, 37 (38.6 %) would refer for early testing and 19.8 % both. Key factors influencing initial preference for GDMT optimization were unoptimized anti-anginal medications, patient preference, increased complication risk, frailty, cognitive impairment and comorbidities. Key factors influencing preference for initial imaging were increasing symptom severity, already optimized GDMT, and electrocardiogram changes. When imaging revealed ischemia, clinicians reported weighing symptom severity, ischemic burden, current medications, comorbidities, frailty, and procedural risks before referring for invasive cardiac angiography.

Conclusion

Both initial GDMT optimization and referral for imaging are frequently used approaches for the symptomatic older patient with suspected or known CAD. The survey highlighted the importance of patient characteristics such as frailty, cognitive impairment, multimorbidity and the gap in clinical guidance on how to optimally manage symptomatic older adults with CAD.
临床实践模式在老年多病成人提出疑似缺血性症状:一项多中心调查
背景:当疑似或已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者出现新的或恶化的缺血性症状时,初步转诊到影像学检查或优化指导药物治疗(GDMT)并推迟检测都是可接受的治疗方法。方法在这项12个中心的研究中,对临床医生进行了一项19项调查,探讨了有或没有已知CAD的有症状老年人(≥75岁)的首选管理策略,以及推动这一决策的主要患者和临床因素。结果调查对象96人,其中心脏病科医生占70.8%,初级保健医生/老年病医生占20.9%。在没有已知CAD的患者中,59名(61.4%)受访者倾向于早期转诊检测,6名(6.3%)选择初始GDMT, 23名(24.0%)更倾向于两者兼有。对于已知CAD的患者,27例(28.1%)优先考虑初始GDMT优化,37例(38.6%)优先考虑早期检测,19.8%同时考虑。影响GDMT优化初始偏好的关键因素是未优化的抗心绞痛药物、患者偏好、并发症风险增加、虚弱、认知障碍和合并症。影响首选初始显像的关键因素是症状严重程度增加、已优化的GDMT和心电图变化。当影像学显示缺血时,临床医生报告在进行有创心脏血管造影前权衡症状严重程度、缺血负担、当前药物、合并症、虚弱和手术风险。结论初始GDMT优化和转诊影像学检查是有症状的老年疑似或已知CAD患者常用的治疗方法。该调查强调了患者特征的重要性,如虚弱、认知障碍、多病,以及如何最佳管理有症状的老年CAD患者的临床指导的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信