Farm typology-based strategy for targeted climate-smart agriculture interventions: A case study in the Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone of Ghana

Meron Awoke Eshetae , Yodit Balcha , Stephen Yeboah , Zenebe Adimassu , Wuletawu Abera
{"title":"Farm typology-based strategy for targeted climate-smart agriculture interventions: A case study in the Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone of Ghana","authors":"Meron Awoke Eshetae ,&nbsp;Yodit Balcha ,&nbsp;Stephen Yeboah ,&nbsp;Zenebe Adimassu ,&nbsp;Wuletawu Abera","doi":"10.1016/j.csag.2025.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Farms in Ghana’s Guinea Savannah are highly vulnerable to climate shocks, threatening food security and agricultural development. While climate-smart solutions exist, they often overlook the specific needs of farmers, including their social dynamics, resource endowments, and priorities. This study applies a farm typology approach to identify and characterize farm types and develop a tailored climate-smart agricultural (CSA) intervention strategy suited to the Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone, covering four regions: Bono East, Northern, Upper West, and Upper East. Factor Analysis for Mixed Data was used to analyze farm typology, integrating principal component analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. This revealed four distinct farm types: Low, medium, medium-to-high, and high resource-endowed farms. Medium-to-high resource-endowed farms (43 ​%) predominated, followed by medium resource-endowed farms (28 ​%). Distribution of farm types varied across regions of the study zone: Low and medium-to-high resource-endowed farms were dominant in the Northern and Bono East regions, respectively, while medium and high resource-endowed farms were most common in the Upper West and Upper East regions, respectively. Climate risks faced by each farm type were identified. Drought was the primary risk to all farm types but its impact was most severe on low and high resource-endowed farms. A multi-step approach was then applied to develop CSA strategies tailored to each farm type, with context-specific CSA practices recommended to enhance farm resilience and agricultural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100262,"journal":{"name":"Climate Smart Agriculture","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Smart Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409025000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farms in Ghana’s Guinea Savannah are highly vulnerable to climate shocks, threatening food security and agricultural development. While climate-smart solutions exist, they often overlook the specific needs of farmers, including their social dynamics, resource endowments, and priorities. This study applies a farm typology approach to identify and characterize farm types and develop a tailored climate-smart agricultural (CSA) intervention strategy suited to the Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone, covering four regions: Bono East, Northern, Upper West, and Upper East. Factor Analysis for Mixed Data was used to analyze farm typology, integrating principal component analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. This revealed four distinct farm types: Low, medium, medium-to-high, and high resource-endowed farms. Medium-to-high resource-endowed farms (43 ​%) predominated, followed by medium resource-endowed farms (28 ​%). Distribution of farm types varied across regions of the study zone: Low and medium-to-high resource-endowed farms were dominant in the Northern and Bono East regions, respectively, while medium and high resource-endowed farms were most common in the Upper West and Upper East regions, respectively. Climate risks faced by each farm type were identified. Drought was the primary risk to all farm types but its impact was most severe on low and high resource-endowed farms. A multi-step approach was then applied to develop CSA strategies tailored to each farm type, with context-specific CSA practices recommended to enhance farm resilience and agricultural development.

Abstract Image

基于农场类型的气候智慧型农业干预策略:以加纳几内亚大草原农业生态区为例
加纳几内亚大草原的农场极易受到气候冲击的影响,威胁着粮食安全和农业发展。虽然存在气候智能型解决方案,但它们往往忽视了农民的具体需求,包括他们的社会动态、资源禀赋和优先事项。本研究采用农场类型学方法来识别和表征农场类型,并制定适合几内亚大草原农业生态区的气候智能型农业(CSA)干预策略,该区域涵盖四个地区:博诺东部、北部、上西部和上东部。混合数据因子分析采用主成分分析和多重对应分析相结合的方法对农场类型进行分析。这揭示了四种不同的农场类型:低、中等、中高和高资源禀赋农场。以中高资源禀赋农场(43%)为主,其次是中等资源禀赋农场(28%)。研究区不同区域的农场类型分布存在差异:低资源禀赋农场和中高资源禀赋农场分别在北部和Bono East地区占主导地位,中高资源禀赋农场分别在上西部和上东部地区最常见。确定了每种农场类型面临的气候风险。干旱是所有类型农场的主要风险,但对资源禀赋低和资源禀赋高的农场影响最为严重。然后采用多步骤方法制定适合每种农场类型的CSA战略,并根据具体情况推荐CSA实践,以增强农场抵御力和农业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信