Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Dasharathraj K. Shetty , R. Vijaya Arjunan , D. Cenitta , Krishnamoorthi Makkithaya , Nikhil Venkatraman Hegde , Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B , Staissy Salu , T.R. Aishwarya , Pranav Bhat , Phani Kumar Pullela
{"title":"Analyzing AI regulation through literature and current trends","authors":"Dasharathraj K. Shetty ,&nbsp;R. Vijaya Arjunan ,&nbsp;D. Cenitta ,&nbsp;Krishnamoorthi Makkithaya ,&nbsp;Nikhil Venkatraman Hegde ,&nbsp;Shreepathy Ranga Bhatta B ,&nbsp;Staissy Salu ,&nbsp;T.R. Aishwarya ,&nbsp;Pranav Bhat ,&nbsp;Phani Kumar Pullela","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 1","pages":"Article 100508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been rapidly evolving, necessitating that discussions on the need and design of regulatory frameworks be taken seriously. This paper reviews literature regarding AI regulations on a theoretical versus a practical level. It examines the different models of regulation – some of which are risk-based regulation and others are complete prohibition – to gauge the literature’s predictions on the scope, precise features, and direction of AI regulation. With particular reference to the EU AI Act as the primary case study, the paper analyzes the consequences of rules on innovation and the international standards’ impact on AI regulatory measures. The results show that almost all scholarly assumptions are accurate, showing how the issues are integrated at the practical level and where is it still challenging to comply and enforce. This paper advocates for continuous improvement in AI regulatory frameworks and more international interactions to ensure efficient governance for AI technologies. It contributes to ongoing debates about creating future-proof adaptable robust AI regulations which can negotiate the complexity between technological development and social protection.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信