{"title":"Towards a just transition: Unpacking the gender differences in household cleaner energy use","authors":"Maneka Jayasinghe , Rohan Best , E.A. Selvanathan , Saroja Selvanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transition intersects between many of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Lack of access to cleaner energy is a main concern of injustice in energy transition policy. Women, especially in developing countries, disproportionately endure the negative consequences of lack of access to cleaner energy particularly in relation to health, education and economic participation outcomes. This study, using four waves of Household Income and Expenditure survey data (2006/07, 2009/10, 2016 and 2019), examines the gender differences in domestic cleaner energy use in Sri Lanka, with a special emphasis on cleaner energy use gap across <em>de-jure</em> and <em>de-facto</em> female-headed households (FHHs). To provide deeper insights into gender differences in cleaner energy use, we utilise the Exogenous Switching Treatment Effect Regression (ESTER) estimation method and the Fairlie decomposition technique. The results indicate that significant differences exist between male-headed households (MHH) and FHH for cooking and lighting approaches among Sri Lankan households. MHH are less likely to use cleaner energy sources for cooking but more likely to use solid cooking fuel when headship-based heterogeneities are taken into consideration. The cleaner-cooking difference between MHH and FHH is most pronounced as assets grow. <em>De-jure</em> FHH are more likely than <em>de-facto</em> FHH to use transitional cooking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108344"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy transition intersects between many of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. Lack of access to cleaner energy is a main concern of injustice in energy transition policy. Women, especially in developing countries, disproportionately endure the negative consequences of lack of access to cleaner energy particularly in relation to health, education and economic participation outcomes. This study, using four waves of Household Income and Expenditure survey data (2006/07, 2009/10, 2016 and 2019), examines the gender differences in domestic cleaner energy use in Sri Lanka, with a special emphasis on cleaner energy use gap across de-jure and de-facto female-headed households (FHHs). To provide deeper insights into gender differences in cleaner energy use, we utilise the Exogenous Switching Treatment Effect Regression (ESTER) estimation method and the Fairlie decomposition technique. The results indicate that significant differences exist between male-headed households (MHH) and FHH for cooking and lighting approaches among Sri Lankan households. MHH are less likely to use cleaner energy sources for cooking but more likely to use solid cooking fuel when headship-based heterogeneities are taken into consideration. The cleaner-cooking difference between MHH and FHH is most pronounced as assets grow. De-jure FHH are more likely than de-facto FHH to use transitional cooking.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.