How does service trade openness promote the green transformation of manufacturing firms? Evidence from China

IF 13.6 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108347

Zhongqiao Shu , Shuijun Peng , Xin Huang

{"title":"How does service trade openness promote the green transformation of manufacturing firms? Evidence from China","authors":"Zhongqiao Shu , Shuijun Peng , Xin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Service intermediate inputs are generally more environmentally friendly and knowledge-intensive compared with goods. As China has continued to promote high-quality development and expand high-standard opening up, this paper aims to investigate how service trade openness of China provides a green upgrading path for manufacturing firms. We first construct a micro theoretical model and deduce three influence channels through which service trade openness can reduce pollution intensity of manufacturing firms: technological progress, cost reduction and efficiency improvement of resource allocation. Then, we estimate the trade costs in service sectors based on the service trade data in OECD database and the structural gravity model, and empirically verify the emission reduction effect of service trade openness with our estimation and China's firm-level data from 1999 to 2007. The results show that service trade openness can effectively reduce the pollution emission intensity of Chinese manufacturing firms through these three channels. And it is noteworthy that the technological progress is mainly due to the improvement of innovation quality, rather than the innovation quantity. In addition, this paper also finds that: (1) Emission reduction effect brought by trade openness in producer services is more significant, while trade openness in non-producer services actually increases firms' pollution intensity due to the crowding-out effect; (2) Emission reduction effect of service trade openness on non-SOEs and non-exporting firms are more manifest. This paper provides feasible paths for China and other developing economies to the achievement of green transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 108347"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325001719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Service intermediate inputs are generally more environmentally friendly and knowledge-intensive compared with goods. As China has continued to promote high-quality development and expand high-standard opening up, this paper aims to investigate how service trade openness of China provides a green upgrading path for manufacturing firms. We first construct a micro theoretical model and deduce three influence channels through which service trade openness can reduce pollution intensity of manufacturing firms: technological progress, cost reduction and efficiency improvement of resource allocation. Then, we estimate the trade costs in service sectors based on the service trade data in OECD database and the structural gravity model, and empirically verify the emission reduction effect of service trade openness with our estimation and China's firm-level data from 1999 to 2007. The results show that service trade openness can effectively reduce the pollution emission intensity of Chinese manufacturing firms through these three channels. And it is noteworthy that the technological progress is mainly due to the improvement of innovation quality, rather than the innovation quantity. In addition, this paper also finds that: (1) Emission reduction effect brought by trade openness in producer services is more significant, while trade openness in non-producer services actually increases firms' pollution intensity due to the crowding-out effect; (2) Emission reduction effect of service trade openness on non-SOEs and non-exporting firms are more manifest. This paper provides feasible paths for China and other developing economies to the achievement of green transformation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Energy Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

18.60

自引率

12.50%

发文量

524

期刊介绍： Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.