Non-pharmacological treatment options for fatigue: A systematic review of RCTs in adults

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Journal of Psychosomatic Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112084

Carlotta Steen , Anna Zalpur , Marissa Bentele , Stephan Zipfel , Andreas Stengel

{"title":"Non-pharmacological treatment options for fatigue: A systematic review of RCTs in adults","authors":"Carlotta Steen , Anna Zalpur , Marissa Bentele , Stephan Zipfel , Andreas Stengel","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Fatigue is a significant contributor to the burden experienced by patients with chronic disorders. The development of standardized treatments is challenging due to the lack of consensus concerning the etiology of fatigue. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue. The efficacy and differences in fatigue treatment across conditions will be explored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo and CINAHL.</div><div>Trials were eligible when (1) adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with disorders causing fatigue were included, (2) non-pharmacological interventions performed, (3) treatment was compared to standard care, placebo or active control group, (4) fatigue was the only primary outcome assessed with a multidimensional tool, and (5) a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>7592 papers were screened. 91 RCTs were eligible, with data reported in 95 papers. Specific fatigue interventions were present for a broad range of conditions. Findings demonstrated promising evidence for physical activity, CBT, online programs and multidimensional modules. Additional types of interventions were effective, but evidence was limited due to risk of bias and small sample sizes. Due to high heterogeneity concerning methodology, a meta-analysis was not possible.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Several non-pharmacological treatment options for fatigue are promising. No clear evidence was found that fatigue should be treated differently depending on the underlying condition. However, further research is necessary with a focus on a transdiagnostic approach to fatigue, high study quality and long-term follow-ups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925000480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Fatigue is a significant contributor to the burden experienced by patients with chronic disorders. The development of standardized treatments is challenging due to the lack of consensus concerning the etiology of fatigue. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue. The efficacy and differences in fatigue treatment across conditions will be explored.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo and CINAHL.

Trials were eligible when (1) adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with disorders causing fatigue were included, (2) non-pharmacological interventions performed, (3) treatment was compared to standard care, placebo or active control group, (4) fatigue was the only primary outcome assessed with a multidimensional tool, and (5) a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was applied.

Results

7592 papers were screened. 91 RCTs were eligible, with data reported in 95 papers. Specific fatigue interventions were present for a broad range of conditions. Findings demonstrated promising evidence for physical activity, CBT, online programs and multidimensional modules. Additional types of interventions were effective, but evidence was limited due to risk of bias and small sample sizes. Due to high heterogeneity concerning methodology, a meta-analysis was not possible.

Conclusion

Several non-pharmacological treatment options for fatigue are promising. No clear evidence was found that fatigue should be treated differently depending on the underlying condition. However, further research is necessary with a focus on a transdiagnostic approach to fatigue, high study quality and long-term follow-ups.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

6.40%

发文量

314

审稿时长

6.2 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.