The impact of postmortem damage on 3D-3D superimposition in the pair-matching of skeletal remains: A cautionary note

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Andrea Palamenghi , Annalisa Cappella , Riccardo Solazzo , Debora Mazzarelli , Eugenio Cosentini , Danilo De Angelis , Chiarella Sforza , Daniele Gibelli , Cristina Cattaneo
{"title":"The impact of postmortem damage on 3D-3D superimposition in the pair-matching of skeletal remains: A cautionary note","authors":"Andrea Palamenghi ,&nbsp;Annalisa Cappella ,&nbsp;Riccardo Solazzo ,&nbsp;Debora Mazzarelli ,&nbsp;Eugenio Cosentini ,&nbsp;Danilo De Angelis ,&nbsp;Chiarella Sforza ,&nbsp;Daniele Gibelli ,&nbsp;Cristina Cattaneo","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The influence of incompleteness and fragmentation of skeletal remains on novel methods for pair-matching is still unaddressed.<!--> <!-->For this study 154 innominate bones from 77 male individuals were selected. The bones presented different rates of preservation, which was systematically assessed, including three classes.<!--> <!-->The models were acquired with a stereophotogrammetric device and edited to isolate the iliac region. For each class, the left model was mirrored and superimposed on the right one, and the point-to-point distance of each superimposition was recorded in terms of Root-Mean-Square (RMS) value. Seventy-seven superimpositions between true-matches and 30 superimpositions between mismatches (10 for each class of preservation) were performed. Statistical differences between RMS values of the three classes were investigated with a<!--> <!-->two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)<!--> <!-->test (p &lt; 0.05).</div><div>ANOVA revealed significant main effects for both “Type of superimposition” (match or mismatch), and “Class of preservation”, both with a p-value &lt; 0.001. Significant differences between matches and mismatches within each level of “Class of preservation” were found (p &lt; 0.001), with matches having significantly lower RMS values compared to mismatches. Overall, the results showed the interaction between the Type of superimposition and Class of preservation, where the preservation state significantly affects the RMS outcome of the superimposition.</div><div>For the first time, this test systematically demonstrated that the RMS distance values of bones affected by postmortem damage differ according to the extent of the damage. Medium to considerable damage intensively affect the performance of the 3D-3D pair-matching, leaving this issue unresolved for future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622325000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of incompleteness and fragmentation of skeletal remains on novel methods for pair-matching is still unaddressed. For this study 154 innominate bones from 77 male individuals were selected. The bones presented different rates of preservation, which was systematically assessed, including three classes. The models were acquired with a stereophotogrammetric device and edited to isolate the iliac region. For each class, the left model was mirrored and superimposed on the right one, and the point-to-point distance of each superimposition was recorded in terms of Root-Mean-Square (RMS) value. Seventy-seven superimpositions between true-matches and 30 superimpositions between mismatches (10 for each class of preservation) were performed. Statistical differences between RMS values of the three classes were investigated with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (p < 0.05).
ANOVA revealed significant main effects for both “Type of superimposition” (match or mismatch), and “Class of preservation”, both with a p-value < 0.001. Significant differences between matches and mismatches within each level of “Class of preservation” were found (p < 0.001), with matches having significantly lower RMS values compared to mismatches. Overall, the results showed the interaction between the Type of superimposition and Class of preservation, where the preservation state significantly affects the RMS outcome of the superimposition.
For the first time, this test systematically demonstrated that the RMS distance values of bones affected by postmortem damage differ according to the extent of the damage. Medium to considerable damage intensively affect the performance of the 3D-3D pair-matching, leaving this issue unresolved for future studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Legal Medicine
Legal Medicine Nursing-Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine. Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信