Transfusion-associated circulatory overload: A retrospective audit of risk assessment practices in a large teaching hospital

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Samuel Anokye Badu
{"title":"Transfusion-associated circulatory overload: A retrospective audit of risk assessment practices in a large teaching hospital","authors":"Samuel Anokye Badu","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is a serious transfusion reaction and a leading cause of transfusion-related mortality. It is recommended that all patients requiring blood transfusion should be assessed for the risk of TACO. The 2022 Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) report indicated a TACO risk assessment compliance rate of 35.6 % across the United Kingdom. This retrospective audit evaluated the TACO risk assessment compliance of a large teaching hospital in Northwest England.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>TACO risk assessments were reviewed from November 2022 to December 2023. Data was collected from paper and electronic patient records. The accuracy of the completed risk assessments was assessed against the 2022 SHOT guidance and patient medical records.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>44 transfusion pathways were reviewed. 59 % (26/44) had a TACO risk assessment completed, and 41 % (18/44) lacked any risk assessment. 12 % (3/26) ofthe completed risk assessments were incorrect. 50 % (9/18) of the pathways without a risk assessment were at risk of TACO. Despite the identified inaccuracies, no TACO cases were recorded. 43 % (19/26) of completed risk assessments were performed in outpatient, compared to 16 % (7/26) completed in inpatient areas; this may be</div><div>attributable to varying workloads in these clinical areas.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The proportion of patients without a TACO risk assessment pretransfusion was significant. A small percentage of the completed assessments were inaccurate, due to missed patient risks or a lack of mitigation plan. Healthcare professionals require improved training to ensure robust peri-transfusion documentation and patient safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 104105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050225000394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is a serious transfusion reaction and a leading cause of transfusion-related mortality. It is recommended that all patients requiring blood transfusion should be assessed for the risk of TACO. The 2022 Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) report indicated a TACO risk assessment compliance rate of 35.6 % across the United Kingdom. This retrospective audit evaluated the TACO risk assessment compliance of a large teaching hospital in Northwest England.

Methodology

TACO risk assessments were reviewed from November 2022 to December 2023. Data was collected from paper and electronic patient records. The accuracy of the completed risk assessments was assessed against the 2022 SHOT guidance and patient medical records.

Results

44 transfusion pathways were reviewed. 59 % (26/44) had a TACO risk assessment completed, and 41 % (18/44) lacked any risk assessment. 12 % (3/26) ofthe completed risk assessments were incorrect. 50 % (9/18) of the pathways without a risk assessment were at risk of TACO. Despite the identified inaccuracies, no TACO cases were recorded. 43 % (19/26) of completed risk assessments were performed in outpatient, compared to 16 % (7/26) completed in inpatient areas; this may be
attributable to varying workloads in these clinical areas.

Conclusion

The proportion of patients without a TACO risk assessment pretransfusion was significant. A small percentage of the completed assessments were inaccurate, due to missed patient risks or a lack of mitigation plan. Healthcare professionals require improved training to ensure robust peri-transfusion documentation and patient safety.
输血相关循环负荷:对某大型教学医院风险评估实践的回顾性审计
输血相关循环负荷(TACO)是一种严重的输血反应,也是输血相关死亡的主要原因。建议对所有需要输血的患者进行TACO风险评估。2022年输血严重危害(SHOT)报告显示,整个英国的TACO风险评估符合率为35.6% %。本研究对英格兰西北部一家大型教学医院的TACO风险评估符合性进行了回顾性审核。从2022年11月至2023年12月对taco风险评估进行了审查。数据从纸质和电子病历中收集。根据2022年SHOT指南和患者医疗记录评估完成的风险评估的准确性。结果回顾了44条输血途径。59 %(26/44)完成了TACO风险评估,41 %(18/44)没有任何风险评估。12 %(3/26)完成的风险评估不正确。50% %(9/18)未进行风险评估的通路存在TACO风险。尽管发现了不准确,但没有记录TACO病例。43% %(19/26)的风险评估在门诊完成,16% %(7/26)的风险评估在住院区完成;这可能是由于这些临床领域的工作量不同。结论输血前未进行TACO风险评估的患者比例显著。由于遗漏了患者风险或缺乏缓解计划,完成的评估中有一小部分是不准确的。医疗保健专业人员需要改进培训,以确保强有力的输血前后记录和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信