Soil bacterial communities benefit from long-term cover crop mixtures

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Biyensa Gurmessa , Ranjith P. Udawatta , R. Tharindu Rambadagalla , Timothy Reinbott
{"title":"Soil bacterial communities benefit from long-term cover crop mixtures","authors":"Biyensa Gurmessa ,&nbsp;Ranjith P. Udawatta ,&nbsp;R. Tharindu Rambadagalla ,&nbsp;Timothy Reinbott","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2025.103714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the long-term impacts of cover cropping on soil health indicators is vital for developing sustainable farming practices. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impacts of long-term mixed cover crops practice in a no-till system on soil bacterial community abundance and diversity using 16S rRNA sequencing. We compared three cover crop practices againist a no-cover crop control (NCC): cereal rye only (Rye), a mixture of cereal rye and hairy vetch (RyeHV), and a mixture of cereal rye, hairy vetch, crimson clover, and Australian winter pea (Mixed). These treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The abundance of soil bacteria was lower in the Rye treatment compared to the Mixed and RyeHV treatments, possibly due to the uniform supply of resources (exudates) and the limited root structure, rather than due to the increased soil bulk density or reduced organic carbon. This reduction was observed in the total operational taxonomic units and the dominant taxa groups, including Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Acidobacteria. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling analysis, using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, revealed distinct bacterial community structure between the Rye and the rest of treatments, but with a potential overlap of that of NCC with all the cover crop treatments. In conclusion, our study revealed that unlike mixed species cover crops, a single species cover crops may compete for resources with soil bacterial community, leading to a reduced abundance of soil bacteria. Moreover, possible positive impact of cover cropping on soil physicochemical properties may not always have relationships with soil bacterial alpha diversity. Future research should explore attributes of mixed cover crops that may be crucial in driving microbial community structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 103714"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556325000068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the long-term impacts of cover cropping on soil health indicators is vital for developing sustainable farming practices. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impacts of long-term mixed cover crops practice in a no-till system on soil bacterial community abundance and diversity using 16S rRNA sequencing. We compared three cover crop practices againist a no-cover crop control (NCC): cereal rye only (Rye), a mixture of cereal rye and hairy vetch (RyeHV), and a mixture of cereal rye, hairy vetch, crimson clover, and Australian winter pea (Mixed). These treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The abundance of soil bacteria was lower in the Rye treatment compared to the Mixed and RyeHV treatments, possibly due to the uniform supply of resources (exudates) and the limited root structure, rather than due to the increased soil bulk density or reduced organic carbon. This reduction was observed in the total operational taxonomic units and the dominant taxa groups, including Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Acidobacteria. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling analysis, using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, revealed distinct bacterial community structure between the Rye and the rest of treatments, but with a potential overlap of that of NCC with all the cover crop treatments. In conclusion, our study revealed that unlike mixed species cover crops, a single species cover crops may compete for resources with soil bacterial community, leading to a reduced abundance of soil bacteria. Moreover, possible positive impact of cover cropping on soil physicochemical properties may not always have relationships with soil bacterial alpha diversity. Future research should explore attributes of mixed cover crops that may be crucial in driving microbial community structure.
土壤细菌群落受益于长期混合覆盖作物
了解覆盖种植对土壤健康指标的长期影响,对于发展可持续农业做法至关重要。本研究旨在利用16S rRNA测序技术研究免耕制度下长期混作覆盖作物对土壤细菌群落丰度和多样性的影响。我们将三种覆盖作物与无覆盖作物控制(NCC)进行了比较:仅谷物黑麦(rye),谷物黑麦和毛豌豆的混合物(RyeHV),谷物黑麦,毛豌豆,深红色三叶草和澳大利亚冬豆的混合物(Mixed)。这些处理采用完全随机区组设计,每组4个重复。黑麦处理土壤细菌丰度低于混合处理和黑麦处理,可能是由于资源(渗出物)供应均匀和根系结构有限,而不是由于土壤容重增加或有机碳减少。在总操作分类单位和优势分类群(包括放线菌门、变形菌门、厚壁菌门和酸杆菌门)中观察到这种减少。利用Bray-Curtis差异进行非度量多维尺度分析,发现黑麦与其他处理之间存在明显的细菌群落结构差异,但黑麦与所有覆盖作物处理之间存在潜在的重叠。综上所述,与混合种覆盖作物不同,单一种覆盖作物可能会与土壤细菌群落争夺资源,导致土壤细菌丰度降低。此外,覆盖种植对土壤理化性质可能产生的积极影响并不总是与土壤细菌α多样性有关。未来的研究应探索混合覆盖作物的属性,这些属性可能对驱动微生物群落结构至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信