Investigation of seventh-grade students' performance in translating among multiple representations of fractions

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Osman Birgin , Emine Eryılmaz
{"title":"Investigation of seventh-grade students' performance in translating among multiple representations of fractions","authors":"Osman Birgin ,&nbsp;Emine Eryılmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to investigate seventh-grade students’ performance in translating among multiple representations of fractions (symbolic, linguistic/verbal, visual, realistic). The participants consisted of 243 seventh-grade students (12–13 years old) from a public middle school in western Türkiye. Data were collected via the multiple representation translation instrument for fractions, which consisted of fifteen written response questions. The students' responses to the questions were scored according to the rubric. The data were analyzed via SPSS 17.0 with descriptive statistics, Friedman's test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The results of the study indicated that students' translation performance differed significantly among the multiple representations of fractions. The area models were used significantly more often than the set, length, and volume models for the visualization of fractions. Students performed significantly better in translating the symbolic-visual representations of fractions than in translating the linguistic-visual and realistic-visual representations. Compared with the length and volume models, the students performed better in translating from the area and set models of fractions to symbolic, linguistic, and realistic representations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125000586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate seventh-grade students’ performance in translating among multiple representations of fractions (symbolic, linguistic/verbal, visual, realistic). The participants consisted of 243 seventh-grade students (12–13 years old) from a public middle school in western Türkiye. Data were collected via the multiple representation translation instrument for fractions, which consisted of fifteen written response questions. The students' responses to the questions were scored according to the rubric. The data were analyzed via SPSS 17.0 with descriptive statistics, Friedman's test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The results of the study indicated that students' translation performance differed significantly among the multiple representations of fractions. The area models were used significantly more often than the set, length, and volume models for the visualization of fractions. Students performed significantly better in translating the symbolic-visual representations of fractions than in translating the linguistic-visual and realistic-visual representations. Compared with the length and volume models, the students performed better in translating from the area and set models of fractions to symbolic, linguistic, and realistic representations.
七年级学生分数多表示间翻译成绩的调查
摘要本研究旨在探讨七年级学生在分数的多种表征(符号表征、语言/口头表征、视觉表征、现实表征)之间的翻译表现。参与者包括243名来自西部基耶一所公立中学的七年级学生(12-13岁)。通过分数的多重表示翻译工具收集数据,该工具由15个书面回答问题组成。学生们对问题的回答是根据题目打分的。采用SPSS 17.0统计软件进行数据分析,采用描述性统计、Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。研究结果表明,在分数的多重表征中,学生的翻译成绩存在显著差异。面积模型比集合、长度和体积模型更常用于分数的可视化。学生在翻译分数的符号-视觉表征方面的表现明显优于翻译语言-视觉表征和现实-视觉表征。与长度和体积模型相比,学生在将分数的面积和集合模型转换为符号、语言和现实表示方面表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信