Using theory-informed, arts-based research translation to change community attitudes towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison: A randomised controlled trial

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Timothy R. Broady , Kerryn Drysdale , Loren Brener , Sophia Schroeder , Alison D. Marshall , Lise Lafferty , Peter Higgs , Eileen Baldry , Paul Dietze , Mark Stoove , Carla Treloar
{"title":"Using theory-informed, arts-based research translation to change community attitudes towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Timothy R. Broady ,&nbsp;Kerryn Drysdale ,&nbsp;Loren Brener ,&nbsp;Sophia Schroeder ,&nbsp;Alison D. Marshall ,&nbsp;Lise Lafferty ,&nbsp;Peter Higgs ,&nbsp;Eileen Baldry ,&nbsp;Paul Dietze ,&nbsp;Mark Stoove ,&nbsp;Carla Treloar","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Community attitudes contribute to social exclusion of people with incarceration and injecting drug use histories. Interventions that positively impact community attitudes can strengthen efforts to reduce recidivism and support positive outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of such interventions on public perceptions towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Randomised controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A narrative script on the theme of \"exhaustion” was produced from an interview study of post-release experiences. Members of the public participated in a three-armed randomised controlled trial: (1) control; (2) neutral intervention (plain English description); (3) narrative intervention (scripted performance). Surveys administered at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up measured perceptions of the target group through four key dimensions of stigma. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 participants to further investigate responses to the narrative intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1071 participants completed all phases of the trial. Post-intervention scores indicated more positive perceptions among participants in the neutral and narrative intervention arms than the control arm. Effects were mostly more positive for the narrative intervention arm. At follow-up, scores for the neutral intervention arm indicated more positive perceptions than the control arm on the Opinions scale, while the narrative intervention arm recorded more positive perceptions than the control arm on both Opinions and Attitudes scales. Interviews indicated that participants who were not influenced by the narrative intervention believed that people who inject drugs should be held accountable for not controlling their drug use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Research-informed, co-designed, arts-based interventions can positively impact public perceptions of a highly stigmatised group. Effects of the interventions attenuated over time, suggesting a need for further interventions focusing on perceptions of controllability of drug use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Community attitudes contribute to social exclusion of people with incarceration and injecting drug use histories. Interventions that positively impact community attitudes can strengthen efforts to reduce recidivism and support positive outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of such interventions on public perceptions towards people who inject drugs newly released from prison.

Study design

Randomised controlled trial.

Method

A narrative script on the theme of "exhaustion” was produced from an interview study of post-release experiences. Members of the public participated in a three-armed randomised controlled trial: (1) control; (2) neutral intervention (plain English description); (3) narrative intervention (scripted performance). Surveys administered at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up measured perceptions of the target group through four key dimensions of stigma. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 participants to further investigate responses to the narrative intervention.

Results

1071 participants completed all phases of the trial. Post-intervention scores indicated more positive perceptions among participants in the neutral and narrative intervention arms than the control arm. Effects were mostly more positive for the narrative intervention arm. At follow-up, scores for the neutral intervention arm indicated more positive perceptions than the control arm on the Opinions scale, while the narrative intervention arm recorded more positive perceptions than the control arm on both Opinions and Attitudes scales. Interviews indicated that participants who were not influenced by the narrative intervention believed that people who inject drugs should be held accountable for not controlling their drug use.

Conclusion

Research-informed, co-designed, arts-based interventions can positively impact public perceptions of a highly stigmatised group. Effects of the interventions attenuated over time, suggesting a need for further interventions focusing on perceptions of controllability of drug use.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信